Star Wars Episode 3 Trailer vs. Halo

The best video i'll probably ever make. Inspired by an absolutely awful version of this I found on google video, I decided to put myself to the test to make one.

I believe I have succeeded in it, it isnt perfect, nothin ever can be really :P but I tried my best on her, and I believe its good enough.

ENJOY!!!!!!!!!

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• Star
• Wars
• Episode
• Three
• Trailer
• vs.
• Halo
• crossover
• parody
• master
• Chief
• amazing
• fantastic

[dren999]

Are you sure?

An acclamator troop TRANSPORT, has a power output of 200 trillion gigawatts (AoTc:AmazingCrossections)

The unyielding hierophant uses generators that peak output of 512 terawatts(Halo:FirstStrike)

The Covernant would need 136,718,750 reactors stationed throughout the station to match the single pre-imperial transport.

The 70 Trillion gigawatt shield heat dissipation acclamator, will make you spend 6140 bombs against it, cause it only has a yield of 27 gigatons(halopedia)

[blacksun2175]

LOL it takes at least 30 some odd covenant ships to glass a planet in 12 hours it takes one Acclamator the same time to MELT the crust of a planet.

So 1 troop transport in starwars has the firepower of more than 30 covenant vessels.

LOL

[zeratul1356]

@Edge123455

Actually, Halo got most of its ideas from Marathon.Look it up.Just because its sci fi doesnt mean it copied star wars.And in truth, it could be said that star wars took many ideas from older sci fi series

[zeratul1356]

@blacksun2175

To be honestly, sometimes I wonder if they exaggerate the firepower.You watch any of the movies or shows, I have yet to see anything that could melt the crust on a planet.Realisticly, it would depend on the planet and its crust.And I could hardly see laser canons doing a whole lot to the planet.Not to mention I find it hardly realistic that one transport could do that much damage.But then again, star wars isnt realistic(halo takes the more realism approach)

[CountTambor21]

@Adam32110 We also have whats called the world devastators, sun crusher, star forge, Galaxy Gun. Ohh and Darth Nihilus=)

[Adam32110]

Guys come on. For all you saying star wars is better and there ships are better and they would beat halo without them being able to fight back well try putting up a death star against all the halo rings...... yeah thats what i thought........

[ninjawars123]

hey star wars ships beats halo ships by far i mean ARC-170 v bansheed arcs have 2 gun banshees 1 seat arc 3 seats i mean on infantry ships are better than 1 of halos cruisers

[wellsley117]

This was hilarious!

Please, guys, the Star Wars vs Star Trek is enough! Each universe has its own perks, downsides, science, characters and means of going about telling their unique stories. Personally, Halo is my favorite, because it just is. I don't care if the Death Star could obliterate the Covenant. Just understand that because Halo is just a video games with some *couchbadlywrittencough* books means that there isn't a strong fanbase of people who actually know what's going on in the story

[Edge123455]

This is why SW > Halo..

1) SW conquered the whole galaxy and other small nearby galaxies

2) In SW there were huge factions that controlled all the galaxie, imagine the power, size and technology that it takes.

3) SW has the tech to build the death star.

4)They have discovered the force..

On the other hand...

1) Halo still uses bullets.

2) Only a few hundred solar systems are involved

3) Halo got most of it's technology ideas from SW and ST.

4)Halo is just a game series!

[shadowvader1950]

0o0