Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

George Galloway talks to some nutters [EDITED]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,781
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 4, 2008

George Galloway takes 3 calls (not one after the other but edited from 3 different occasions on the same day it was broadcasted) from a bunch of fools, each with an explosive outcome.

The first caller (who claims to be polyglot but has difficulty debating with Galloway) talks about the problems in Palestine, that Israel withdrew from the Gaza strip. He also defames Galloway by calling him anti-American, anti-British and anti-Jewish. He also conflates (twice) by associating Jews with Israel. To add further insult to injury, he believes there something wrong within the core of the Palestinian people because of the perceived rampant infighting.

The second caller believes there is no war in Afghanistan/Iraq even though there is for the former as of 2010. He also comments on how he doesn't object to the protests. No war? What about the 25 Afghan civilians torn to pieces by American bombs, 68 American soldiers killed in Iraq in June 2007, 127 killed in May 2007 and 124 killed in April 2007.

The third caller is a bible basher who thinks there isn't (and never has been) a Palestine.

Originally broadcasted on 22nd June 2007.

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • george youre a legend... it s such a shame that you have to cope with the twats..... you deserve more, unfortunately though honesty doesnt seem to have a place in this world!!

  • "i'm sorry i've had enough of this" would that be because you were losing the argument george? you're a big man with your volume button aren't you.

see all

All Comments (243)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I LOVE GEORGE GALLOWAY

  • AMAZING !

  • @AndreHiltre

    WHAT? You asked "How can there be a mural in Parliament from 1179 when that building was only built in the 19th century?" I gave you an answer on "How that could be" Wether it's the case or not doesn't disprove the theory. If you had said. "The statue was only built in the victorian era" That would be different.

  • @AndreHiltre

    WHAT? You asked "How can there be a mural in Parliament from 1179 when that building was only built in the 19th century?" I gave you an answer on "How that could be" Wether it's the case or not doesn't disprove the theory. If you had said. "The statue was only built in the victorian era" That would be different.

  • @Cybopath Take your head out of your arse hole please. This is pendantic and pointless.

  • @AndreHiltre

    The question wasn't 'is there' the question was 'how can'. I explained how 'it could'.

  • @Cybopath I know the inside of the house of commons quite well, and the mural in question is definately 19th century. Not just the wall and plaster, but the artistic style is clearly not mediaeval but in the style of Victorian Romanticism. Galloway clearly knows very little about art or the history of that building. But, as I said, he knows a lot about Palestine and the political situation. Like most politicians he doesnt have a broad view, but is good at specific issues. 

  • @AndreHiltre

    Easy a building can be built around a mural, I've seen it plenty of times when Universities etc where built over previously existing buildings.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more