If God Weren't Invisible

"Every breath you take...every move you make...every bond you break...every step you take...I'll be watching you." ~ God (and Sting)

A great point made in a conversation I had with LiveLife8072 and NegationofP is that believers don't act like God is there, watching them. They act appropriately when someone real walks in and catches them in an uncompromising situation, like masturbating or something, but God was already supposed to be there. Perhaps this is a sign that, deep down, they don't truly believe.

One of the most foolish theist responses to this video is that it actually "supports" theism, showing why God remains out of sight. If you believe that, then your belief in God must be incredibly superficial - which is the whole point of the video! Congratulations. Ironically, it is your response that supports this video's point.

Royalty-free music:
"Badass Rasta" by Vampire TNA
http://www.jamendo.com/en/track/392535
"Thanks to the Gods" by Zero-Project
http://www.jamendo.com/en/track/682443
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b...

Sound effects:
Audio file(s) provided by http://www.audiomicro.com

• Category

  Comedy

[ThatRandomPotato]

I love how Gods hair always looks like its flowing in the wind when its not even windy Lol

[eyesofphysics97]

Pt. 3 The complexity required to create the earth with the big bang, or quantum fluctuation, or time tunneling is MUCH less than the complexity required to have an intelligent creator. All one needs to do so scientifically is JUST FOUR elementary forces, Gravity, Electromagnetism, Strong force, and Weak force plus the three spatial dimensions plus time dimension. God requires so much complexity, that there is no way I could even type it out on YouTube...

[EthanLovesYou11]

LOL

[eyesofphysics97]

Read up sonny, research today is concluding that it is possible that at this very moment,there is, and always, a net balance of zero mass and zero energy in the universe. How? Welcome to the world of antimatter and anti energy, the opposite of their counterparts. If our universe has equal parts of both, it would be like a jar of red and blue jellybeans if shaken enough ( infinitely), will just because of probability, end up separating into two sides.

[eyesofphysics97]

Very well, the label does not change my perception on logic and being rational. I shall accept all which shows conclusive proof, no Easter bunnies, no unicorns, and no proof lacking creators. Now before you respond, I have made my stance clear, can I know what exactly you believe in?

[eyesofphysics97]

(only quantum fluctuation) and the big bang, there is an infinity to one or nearly infinity to one chance of there BEING a universe, with enough time comes infinite possibility. And even though there are infinite possibilities, this still prefers the option of simple over complex, or in other words, two particles colliding over the random generation of a creator who gets energy from who knows where, has no effect on mass unless he wants to, controls time, all for an experiment.

[eyesofphysics97]

pt. 3 and billions upon billions of solar systems, absolutely baffling and absurd. Instead of thinking of it as a creator's experiment, think of the much greater chance of a quantum fluctuation creating separation of positives and negatives (look up the theory on how the universe could be at the energy and mass level of zero, the antimatter and anti-energy cancelling out regular matter and energy). Given an infinite or nearly infinite amount of time between nothingness ...

[eyesofphysics97]

Pt. 2 the Universe would require vast ability to move matter and energy across the fourth previously stated spatial dimension to alter matter and energy along our world (look up dark matter and dark energy). He would also have to have existed before the big bang, in other words, before space and time, or if you believe ancient world views, he would require 6/7ths of his time to create the earth and only 1/7 to create EVERYTHING ELSE, INCLUDING making HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of earth like plants...

[eyesofphysics97]

Well to begin with, (Including all of the forces previously mentioned for a god free world) one would imagine He requires another dimension if he was to be omnipresent, perhaps one scaled down to let him be everywhere in the three spatial dimensions at once. Either another time dimension to squeeze himself in all of time so he can be always existing, or perhaps a frozen time dimension. He would need wormholes galore if he were to operate within three dimensions, and his influence on Pt. 1

[LittleLlion]

lol you mean if you saw this god?

[LittleLlion]

That means you are an atheist because you find your and other people's reasoning to bring you to the belief that there is no god.

But since you say you can not disprove or prove and thus can not know for sure what's true you hold an agnostic view about it. This means you are an agnostic atheist. (with someone that believes there is a god but says he doesn't know for sure being an agnostic theist and one that has a lack of belief and says he doesn't know just agnostic, or agnostic non-believer.

[LittleLlion]

you could make a start.. enlighten me!