Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' Pilot Questions 9/11

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
20,361
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 6, 2007

Ralph Kolstad, a retired career Navy airman gives us his thoughts about the 9/11 attacks.

http://www.Patriotsquestion911.com
NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT INTENDED. I DO NOT OWN THE RIGHTS TO THIS MUSIC.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
http://www.prisonplanet.com
http://www.infowars.com

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (PostToastie)

  • Instead of all this arguing, Can someone say what hit the pentagon? If it was not a plane, what was it?Where is the proof that anything but a commercial aircraft hit the building? Did not a fireman on the scene watch an aircraft fly ino the pentagaon? Where did all the passenger's go? Were they eliminated? C'mon, someone on here has to have the answer's. Conspiracy junkie's always tell the truth. Where is the evidence That something besides a plane hit the building.

  • Go to my page and watch the playlist called - 'The New 9/11 Pentagon Investigation' Watch it all the way through, then do a google image search for 'aa global hawk' and find the global hawk that has been adorned with the American Airlines logo scheme, then ask yourself why a global hawk was made to look like that.

  • @PostToastie LOL....sweet jesus...there is no way anyone can convince you of anything beside conspiracy. Sorry but you are out to lunch. A global hawk missle would not have pierced a hole into the building that far. A missle would explode on contact thus destroying the immediate area. It would not tranmit energy that far into the building so as to direct said energy to one specific point. I.E. the hole in the fourth inside wall.

  • @barmtrail That all depends on the warhead on it, you should be able to figure that out all by yourself.

  • Why the porn music? :)

  • Pink Floyd = Porn music??????

    LMAO

    Thanks for watching.

Top Comments

  • you have to be completely stupid to believe the official story

  • The building was made of steel not concete.

    Investigate Israel not the Mafia.

    The Mafia did not have two wars against its rivals justified by 9/11.

    Mafia guy did not hold the lease to WTC - a radical Zionist name Silverstein did.

    The head of the Mafia did not not say 9/11 was good for the Mafia but Israeli Prime MInister B. Netanyahu said it was good for Israel.

    60 Israelis were arrested after 9/11 but no Mafia guys were linked to it.

see all

All Comments (100)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @SuperYesyesyo and to 3) there have been numerous plane hits to the NYC skyline. A B-17 crashed into the EMpire State Building. A plane hit one of the towers once before in the late 80's/eraly 90's.

  • @SuperYesyesyo 1) the Pentagon does NOT have a missile defense system within 100 miles of it accurate enought to hit a plane. A plane can turn, missiles heading for a building does not.

  • @balls110 What made the buildings collapse was the fact that so much of the fuel was left and all the energy from burning fuel caused the support beams of the 2-3 floors around the burning to fail

  • As a pilots point of view , its not possible for a guy who has barely 50 or 60 hours on Single engine piston to fly a state of art B767 etc and hit exactly at the point where a collapse is sure...NOT POSSIBLE....NOT POSSIBLE..... Dont know what the fukk happened on that day and who did it..

  • @barmtrail "THE NEW 911 PENTAGON INVESTIGATION" RELIABLE EYEWITNESSES.. AND PLEASE LOOK UP THE DEFINITION OF CONSPIRACY THEORY... EVERYONE THROWS THE TERM AROUND LOOSELY WITHOUT ACTUALLY KNOWING WHAT IT MEANS.. IF U DID KNOW WHAT IT MEANT EXACTLY THEN U WOULD CALLING THE OFFICIAL STORY "CONSPRIACY THEORY"

  • And what about the Anti-missile-system and the cameras from the Pentagon, the most heavy protectet building on earth? Why do they have an anti-missile-system when it doesn`t even protect the building from something that is not even a missile?

    And why at the same time does Rumsfeld slip up saying - the plane in Shanksville was shot down?

    And why did Bush see the first plane hit live on TV before going into the classroom and thought- this is one terrible pilot - when it wasn`t shown on TV?

  • one guy wrote that in one of the 9/11 Pilots for Truth videos, they claim that the cockpit door from AA Flight 77 was never even opened during the alleged highjacking.

    Does somebody know anything about that?

  • @PostToastie you're right, air to air missles are set up to explode foreward so that they focus their energy at a point target just before impact, not an area target like a bomb would in all directions

  • I would love to see this TopGun Pilot make a Testimony to Congress!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more