"Antigravity" method 2a of 15, Ion Asymmetric Electrostatic, Group IB(i)

GROUP I ELECTROSTATIC
Group IB (i) Ion Asymmetric Electrostatic
Antigravity Method 2a of 15, Ion Asymmetric Electrostatic, Group IB(i)
Filmed 1991-1996, 2a of 15 methods of levitating an object known to the author, John Iwaszko, edited from the video Antigravity the reality made in 1996. This video edit shows an experiment from 1994 that tries to explain the relatively unknown phenomena of that era.
This antigravity method is sometimes referred to as the BiefeldBrown effect , an effect that was discovered by Paul Alfred Biefeld (CH) and Thomas Townsend Brown (USA) during extensive research that was performed during the 1950s and 1960's on the use of this electric propulsion. In the following years, many promising concepts had to be abandoned due to technological limitations and were forgotten, and only till recently considered a scientific fable. The effect has only recently as of 2002 become of interest again, after new experiments confirmed the experiments of the past, such flying devices are now known as EHD thrusters, asymmetric capacitors or lifters. Therefore these experiments performed as early as 1994 were revolutionary and way in front of mainstream official scientific acceptance by the US Army Research laboratory in March 2003. This is my attempt to explain the effect as I understood it back in 1996, and according to the Army research lab calculations indicate that ionic wind is at least three orders of magnitude too small to explain the magnitude of the observed force on the Capacitor. So the coined term the Biefeld Brown effect could in actual fact be a true anti-gravity device, the debate continues with evidence for and against. Actual Ion Asymmetric devices in flight to follow.
WARNING:- Some of these experiments operate directly from 240VAC mains supply or far higher voltages at high currents are potentially lethal. Do not build unless you know exactly what you are doing. Do not touch any part of the equipment while it is plugged into a mains outlet. And remember that the methods described do not conform to any electrical safety standard and many of the experiments performed are downright dangerous.
Powerful magnets such as neodymium magnets or powerful magnetic fields generated by coils can be dangerous and not to be played with. Powerful magnets or magnetic fields can crush fingers. The power of magnetism can also cause chunks of metal to take flight.
Extremely intense sounds can burst ear drums or can be physically painful to human ears. High-intensity ultrasound waves are extremely dangerous to experiment with as they can heat human tissue by absorbing ultrasound energy which becomes heat by vibration and corresponding energy loss.
Exposure to radio frequency energy or ionizing radiation that can be generated by coils can not only burn as they get hot but also cause radiation burns, damage to the skin or other biological tissue.
Be careful! Use good solid judgement in your work, and think ahead. I John Iwaszko do not endorse the experiments shown, and am merely passing on information, I have learnt through experiment. Safety is your responsibility!

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Antigravity
• levitation
• ufo
• U.F.O
• flying saucer
• tesla
• high voltage
• AC
• DC
• electrostatic
• High Voltage
• wimshurst
• vandergraph
• Holtz
• static electricity
• Electrogravitics
• generator
• influence machine
• lifter
• spaceship
• craft
• defying gravity
• magnetic
• maglev
• electromagnetic
• asymmetric
• water
• energy
• lightning
• sparks
• physics
• chemistry
• cloud
• weather
• experiment
• free energy
• zero point energy
• alchemy
• alien
• technology
• capacitor
• John Iwaszko
• EHD

[AVAMagneticlev]

I like this one nice work.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@MrAwsome514 When you learn to listen and refute with common courtesy to points made I will then reply to you.

[W33DKingCA]

i was watching something on the tv other night with something that looked like a haarp but with foil on the bottom and was hovering (with a current of air being pulled throught the sqaure sections) when a large electrical current was added and they said no one knows how it works well i think i might have an idea on how this works can ne 1 plz link me or message me a video

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@MrAwsome514 Then you continued you’re made up definition claiming that it is a scientific definition, and then you try to order/ bully me to "stop putting "antigravity" in my titles of your videos.

I then asked you to define where you got your definition of "antigravity" Once again you ignore any of my points and continue with your so called "proper definition" that at this point seems to have been invented my you.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@MrAwsome514 When humans communicate or in a debate we generally offer the common courtesy to reply or refute the points made, as I have done to yours based on what you have presented. Previously I asked you to view Method 1a opening credits in a hope that it will explain why I use the word "antigravity" This was ignored, no comment was made to any points that I made.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@MrAwsome514 No MrAwsome you are making yourself the ass, which by definition is a stupid, foolish, or stubborn person, as I believe I had no other choice, as it is like communicating with a brick wall. I can also see its pointless continuing the conversation as it is a one way affair and a waste of time, just like some people have selective hearing, you have selective reading as well as selective writing back to points made ability.

[MrAwsome514]

@JOHNROMANIWASZKO Congratulations on making yourself out to be an ass for me. It really has saved me a lot of trouble. That is the proper definition of antigravity as any other definition would allow just about anything that can fly to be called antigravity. Actually it does not even have to fly really... By the definition you seem to follow if I threw a ball in the air then it would be a form of antigravity... at least untill it hit's the ground again.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@MrAwsome514 By the way MrAwsome, where did you get your definition of “antigravity” Sir MrAwsome, you are obviously an expert in the field MrAwsome

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@MrAwsome514. Yes Sir MrAwsome, straight away Sir MrAwsome! has anyone told you are Truly Awesome Sir? I’m sorry that I used the word “Antigravity” Mr Awsome, I’m sorry I hurt your feelings MrAwsome, anything you say Sir MrAwsome, anything else Sir MrAwsome, would you like some fries with that Sir MrAwsome.? I will stop using the word “antigravity” NOOOT MrAwsome. Now isn’t that Awsome sir MrAwsome.

[MrAwsome514]

@JOHNROMANIWASZKO Science defines antigravity as to negate or to modify the effect of gravity on an object. None of your examples demonstrate this and as such do not meet the scientific definition of antigravity. As such I shall repeat myself. Please stop putting "antigravity" in the titles of your videos if they have nothing to do with it.

[JOHNROMANIWASZKO]

@highvoltagefeathers, you obviously do not understand what my presentation is about; hopefully Method 1a opening credits will explain it for you.

Thanks for your comment.