***** 3. Evolution vs. Creationism: No Controversy *****
Top Comments
All Comments (3,304)
-
Hey creationists, here's something for you to ponder: If you deny that God is powerful enough to have created a world 2000 years ago THAT WAS ALREADY 4 BILLION YEARS OLD at the moment of creation, then you are denying that he is omnipotent and therefor you are denying your own faith.
-
What about convergence evolution, what a joke that is. Take something like an eye which an evo can't even imagine incremental steps leading up to an eye, let alone happening again and again and again all over the place. This would present a problem, so what do the evo guys do. Well we need a new term, what about convergence evolution. What a crock.
-
The discovery of DNA since Darwin wrote his book, has blown evolution away. The most sophisticated code know to man, did not come about by chance chemical reactions. Abiogenesis still eludes the evo camp. And the fossils don't back up evolution either. Evolution is pseudoscience.
-
@bassmanco I DIDN'T KNOW OF PREVIOS EXCHANGES, I JUST WATCH WHAT INTERESTS ME AND REPLY , MAYBE I DOUBLE REPLIES, I'M KIND OF ABSENT TO ORGANIZATION AND RECALL.
THE REASON FOR THE MULTIPLE POSTING IS THAT I'VE GOT BROWSER PROBLEMS AND HAVE TO WATCH IN AN I. E. FRAME WHICH CRASHES AND GOES WHITE ON ME , IT WASN'T SHOWING THE ENTRY SO I REPEATED CLICKING ON POST TAB AND THE SCREEN CRASHED. BUT I SEE IT POSTED REPETIVE REPLIES. I APOLOGIZE .
GIANFRANCO FRONZI. . 12 / 111
-
@ArcanaKnight NO. GIANFRANCO FRONZI
-
@9493760 Ok. Cool, Now why has it been months since our last exchange on here, and all of a sudden you are back, and have left a very similar comment about 5 times? Its cool, DW, i wouldn't take something personally anyway :/ dont think i got that impression, you can caps lock if you like ^^
-
@ArcanaKnight WHY IS IT STUPID? IF YOU KNEW ME YOU WOULD KNOW I HAVE LITTLE TO FEAR. PLUS ASIMOV WAS A SCIENCE FICTION WRITER , I AM A CREATOR AND REPAIRMAN OF THINGS THAT DON'T ALREADY EXIST.
GIANFRANCO FRONZI. DEC. 17 /11
-
@9493760 Wow, that's just...stupid. I have to disagree with bassmanco that you're a troll just faking it; I think you might really be this ignorant about evolution, and posibly even science in general.
"...NOT THE LAST WORD" Just because there is a possibility that some future discovery might show that what we currently know isn't absolutely right doesn't mean that its completely, unreliably wrong. You should check out this essay by Aasimov: watch?v=2tcOi9a3-B0
-
@ArcanaKnight No better than that it's my phone number.
Gianfranco Fronzi. Dec. 17 / 11
Reasoning with a with a creationist isn't possible.
If they understood reasoning, they would not be creationists.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago 4
@9493760 According the recent radiometric dating they've discovered that the earth (and perhaps this entire solar system) is about 4.54 billion years old. If the early hominids, our ancestors, were living around 15000 years ago, that still means it took over 4 billion years for it to happen, yes?
ccsmiley2 4 months ago