intelligent design theory

DNA is not merely a molecule. Nor is it simply a "pattern."
Yes, it contains chemicals and proteins, but those chemicals
are arranged to form an intricate language, in the exact same way
that English and Chinese and HTML are languages. DNA has a four-letter alphabet, and structures very similar
to words, sentences and paragraphs. With very precise
instructions.

languages, and coded
information ONLY come from a mind. A mind that
agrees on an alphabet and a meaning of words and
sentences. A mind that expresses both desire and
intent. Whether I use the simplest possible explanation,
such as the one I'm giving you here, or if we analyze
language with advanced mathematics and engineering
communication theory, I can say this with total
confidence:

"Messages, languages and coded information never,
ever come from anything else besides a mind.
No one has ever produced a single example of a message
that did not come from a mind." Nature can create fascinating patterns - snowflakes,
sand dunes, crystals, stalagmites and stalagtites. Tornados
and turbulence and cloud formations. But non-living things cannot create language. They
*cannot* create codes. Rocks cannot think and they
cannot talk. And they cannot create information.

It is believed by some that life on planet earth arose
naturally from the "primordial soup," the early ocean which
produced enzymes and eventually RNA, DNA, and primitive cells. But there is still a problem with this theory: It fails to
answer the question, 'Where did the information come from?' To the person who says that life arose naturally,
you need only ask: "Where did the information come from?
Show me just ONE example of a language that didn't come
from a mind."

Does it not amaze anyone else that all life has the DNA code?...and it is all written in the same Language? the probability that nature wrote an alphabet,then a language, then encoded it in DNA then designed a biological machine to carry out its instructions for every life form on this planet-what do you think that mathematical probability would be? now multiply that times every life form on this planet

Category:

Education

Tags:

• intelligent
• design
• theory

[Reaper2020]

well put...I will also add that facts do not care what we believe or dis believe..changes nothing and no one can prove anything ...some clues however sud jest a possible explanation..

[Reaper2020]

most people need a religious explanation to feel their life has meaning and purpose.. I believe we are insignificant,and that all religions are a form of control..I believe in science,science should be the search for the truth no matter where it takes us...the truth is we are microscopic in the universe around us,the other truth is,all lifeforms as we know it is dna based,and dna is information...information show desire/intent which only comes from a mind

[Reaper2020]

oceans of oil and coal are everywhere..broken down from biological lifeforms,indeed lifeforms that were here before all fossil records.. one thing is for sure dna is a blue print and biological mechanisms read the blueprint then construct it ...a mind created this...unless science can prove otherwise this is the only logical explanation

[Reaper2020]

you people always make assumptions of what creationists believe,not all of us believe the same things,I believe very different then what the typical creationists believe...I do not blindly believe in the bible or that I was created in the image of the almighty-I stand on one simple logical principle-information is only created by a mind,whatever that entails dna is a blueprint for all life ,religious believes have nothing to do with facts-past life was here b4 us...this is a fact

[Reaper2020]

not everything that has an answer has to be a complex answer...are you as good at answering questions as you are asking them? like languages, and coded

information ONLY come from a mind. A mind that agrees on an alphabet and a meaning of words and sentences. A mind that expresses both desire and intent.-do you have an example for messages and coded information coming from something other then a mind?

[bdf2718]

When I look at depth-soundings of a lake I am impressed how precisely the water fits the lake-bottom. If I flash-chill the water to ice and remove it, I note that it ENCODES precisely information about the shape of the lake bottom.

The water obviously has a mind. Or you're a fucktard who believes creationist crap. Hmmm, decisions, decisions...

[jbs901]

Why do people always have to be so venomous towards those who believe differently? We need to respect each others' views. Resorting to name calling and insults only fuels flames. If someone wants to believe in the Big Bang, more power to them. If someone wants to believe in a Supreme Being, same thing. We can learn a lot from each other if we can communicate affably instead of jumping down throats at the first mention of "wrong" idea.

[stuarteaston]

i'm really interested to hear that creationists (who seem to think the world is just a few thousand years old) simultaneously believe in fossils of "modern" humans that are a few billion years old. Ooops. Moving to the vid. The thesis seems to be; You need DNA to self replicate so you have to have DNA before replication. If you want to say this is true, you have to first show replication can only occur through DNA and that, my friends, is plain wrong. Your argument is dead.

[feriwarlock]

@Reaper2020 The burden of proof isn't on dwyer. It's on you. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. So far all that has been provided is a conjecture.

[blaisingm]

@Censored4TRUTH "put up an example of a language arising without intelligence."

I think you bring up a good point. Although, I wouldn't consider DNA 'language', but I can't think of another language, code or blueprint that wasn't created by something. I think most people would agree with this. Based on this, what is your point?