MUFON - The Fayetteville Incident - Part 01 of 04
Uploader Comments (Laitings)
All Comments (63)
-
Mufon es un mamahuevo, el cree que lo que dice es la verdad.
-
@sacha4you many of us have seen evidence of visitation, i have. and sure i wish i had had a camera or camcorder to get u evidence but i didnt, but when u see 7 8ft diameter glowing swirling fiery plasma orbs fly right over ur head slowly at about 15 mph 500 ft off the ground. it lets u know that a great deal of evidence is being forcefully removed from the public's perception. they are there and this isn't just something to make money out of entertaining peoples fantasies. its real.
-
Chris Bledsoe contacted me in 2009 and said what I'm filming here in PA is the SAME type UFOs as they saw this night. So I have reason to believe that the ETs in control of these things must look like what he saw, as I believe him 100% -- since I and hundreds of others worldwide have seen the same spherical crafts hovering and glowing brightly.
-
They took ouh jeeeebbbss!!
-
This guy sounds JUST like Matthew McConaughey, If you listen to the video without watching it, you can see Matthew smokin' a fat doobie, talking about his UFO experience!
-
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Actually, it kind of is, but that's not the point.
-
Cole World!!
-
@reigellatte17 soo AGREE with you like life can't get any more boring y are they still flying and hiding
-
I just saw this on TV - the report ignored quite a bit of important stuff - like the fact that helicopters fly over Fayetteville constantly. Were the fishermen drinking that night or doing any drugs? MUFON is not willing to even entertain the notion that someone might NOT have had an encounter. Ridiculous.
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The more fantastic a story sounds and the less physical evidence is available, the more people believe in these fairy tales. Without any doubt, this guy belongs to the category of intelligent attention seekers, who has got his showtime in TV.
;-))
sacha4you 2 years ago
Now I'm not saying, Hey! Here's the proof of alien visitation. And I definetely feel a good bit of sceptisism is a good thing. But to state 'without a doubt'...nope doesn't work for me.
Anyway, I respect your view. And that's the great thing. -We are all free to interpret reality within the realms of our own paradigm.
Laitings 2 years ago
Laitings, reality doesn't need to be interpreted, since a claim (in the scientific sense) can be either true or false. The link between a hypothesis (aka a claim) and a fact is termed a proof. Beliefs are based on wishful thinking - and not on facts. Ordinary people fill in gaps of missing knowledge with beliefs, since they can't handle open hypotheses (aka the unknown). Exo-UFO-conspiracy-tainment industry exploits this mechanism, since they play around with the could-be-true factor.
;-))
sacha4you 2 years ago
I completely agree with you on the scientific part. But nobody is claiming that this case contains scientific proof of alien visitation. But the absence of proof in this case doesn't make it untrue, not even in the scientific sense. You just won't be able to use it for anything...in a scientific sense.
All you can do is to write down the statements the witnesses express as their "truths" and review it the next time a similar event happens.
Laitings 2 years ago