Let us think about philosophical systems. Does philosophy ought to be systematic? Or even how can one tell if a philosophical tract is systematic or not. For example, is Nietzsche systematic? Of course, Hegel is. I am reading Eliade and he seems to be a jungle of words and names and mythologies and etc...But I guess in the end something is explained. Panikkar seems that way too. But its not clear what is explained.
Panikkar makes a point that an atom should not be divided. The atom is sacred. And what did the division bring to mankind. Nuclear desaster. The Being needs to be undivided. There is something about the One and Two that are sacred.
Let us think about philosophical systems. Does philosophy ought to be systematic? Or even how can one tell if a philosophical tract is systematic or not. For example, is Nietzsche systematic? Of course, Hegel is. I am reading Eliade and he seems to be a jungle of words and names and mythologies and etc...But I guess in the end something is explained. Panikkar seems that way too. But its not clear what is explained.
Israe5l 2 months ago
Panikkar makes a point that an atom should not be divided. The atom is sacred. And what did the division bring to mankind. Nuclear desaster. The Being needs to be undivided. There is something about the One and Two that are sacred.
Israe5l 3 months ago
Being? Is Being alive or Being a concept? Or both?
Israe5l 4 months ago