panikkar2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 23, 2011

New Project

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Let us think about philosophical systems. Does philosophy ought to be systematic? Or even how can one tell if a philosophical tract is systematic or not. For example, is Nietzsche systematic? Of course, Hegel is. I am reading Eliade and he seems to be a jungle of words and names and mythologies and etc...But I guess in the end something is explained. Panikkar seems that way too. But its not clear what is explained.

  • Panikkar makes a point that an atom should not be divided. The atom is sacred. And what did the division bring to mankind. Nuclear desaster. The Being needs to be undivided. There is something about the One and Two that are sacred.

  • Being? Is Being alive or Being a concept? Or both?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more