Hints, A Puzzle, and the German New Medicine

The website that presents the results of Dr. Hamer's German New Medicine is fascinating: http:newmedicine.ca . This website presents experimental evidence of cancer work that has led to the cure of more than 90% of the people treated. It certainly is not part of the usual way of seeing disease. I recommend it to you. It suggests that diseases are related to parts of the brain. This leads me to a tentative solution to an interesting puzzle presented by my most successful symbols. It also suggests that the different levels of the human brain, from the most primitive (brain stem or old brain) to the most advanced (cortex) have their own symbols. In other words, each level of the brain has its own emotions. We have experimented with the symbols for each of these levels and I discuss the differences between the symbols for each level.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• health
• healing
• cerebellum
• brain
• stem
• cortex
• experimenting
• hope
• anti-aging
• symbol
• symmetry
• success
• catscan

[DavidM1337]

Richmorr, I think you didn't understand or misinterpreted Dr. Hamers 5th biological law.

I suggest you look at it again closely.

[richmorr9]

DavidM1337,

Thanks for the thoughtful comment. I will look at it more carefully.

[DavidM1337]

Don't worry. Johannes gets payed by the pharma do post these comments. He's everywhere doing that.

[Johannes9126]

@kuei1248

What didn't you understand in "I am trying to slow the dumbing down"?

[kuei1248]

@Johannes9126 ....No, seriously. Answer the question. That's what I thought. No proof!

[Johannes9126]

@kuei1248

"It seems you have alot to lose. Why is that?"

Because I have some slight doubts that letting idiots running things is a good idea. " Please present your proof that all of his cancer patients died."

esowatch(dot)com/ge/index(dot)­php?title=Opfer_der_Germanisch­en_Neuen_Medizin

Can't read German? Hamer writes in German, too.

"Why is it cancer treatment centers are starting to use Hamer's methods if everyone dies from it?"

Hahaha! No, seriously, muahahaha!

[kuei1248]

@Johannes9126 ...You first. I know I am right. You however are dead wrong. Why is it you have so much at stake in something you do not believe? It seems you have alot to lose. Why is that? What is riding on this for you? Please present your proof that all of his cancer patients died. I asked first, and yet you (nor the other guy) can present any. Why is that? Why is it cancer treatment centers are starting to use Hamer's methods if everyone dies from it?

[Johannes9126]

@kuei1248

You are the living proof? Scan the page of your medical/histological diagnosis, upload it on Imageshack or elsewhere (don't forget to black out your name and to tell me where to find it) and then we'll talk. I have encountered too many GNM-idiots who have diagnosed themselves with cancer when actually having a sore throat and such and too many altie-idiots who have used quack-methods for diagnostics of their "cancer". So: Pics or it didn't happen.

[kuei1248]

@Johannes9126 Uhhh, no. Says the prosecutor. It was Hamer's evidence that forced the prosecutor to admit Hamer's success. I am living proof that his methods work. Please present PROOF that his methods don't work, instead of spitting out your bloated rhetoric. How much do you get paid by the insurance companies/pharmas to trash Hamer's science? It must be sad to have to sell yourself.

[Johannes9126]

@kuei1248

Kuei 1248, I just had a look at your profile. Sorry that I have mistaken you for a thinking human being, copkiller. But hey, you got your bone-cancer (scan of the histological diagnosis on imageshack or it didn't happen) healed by this nonsense. Another proof that there is no biological sense in the GNM, even IF it should work...

[Johannes9126]

@kuei1248

...says Hamer. Hamer could never present the illnesses of his patients in a proper and scientific way of diagnosing and protocolling. And I can claim that because I have read some of his supposedly "scientific" writings. And I am not even talking about a proper follow-up study for 5-10 years.

[kuei1248]

@Johannes9126 ...Actually the PROSECUTORS in he trial were forced to admit his success rate.