Zeitgeist Proven False (Part 2 of 5)
Uploader Comments (ggcage)
Top Comments
-
You know, it doesn't matter what the author of this video believes. So far he seems to have his facts straight. The important lesson I'm taking away from this series is that the first film in the Zeitgeist trilogy was founded on blatant lies. I'm an atheist and I care about truth. If this is how Zeitgeist sold their movement then fuck them, they are untrustworthy.
-
Thank you for using actually Astronomy instead of misleading generalizations.
All Comments (76)
-
@OutlawGrrl At least your willing to search for the truth!
-
In Spanish it is still "Los Tres Reyes Magos", or loosely translated: The Three Magi Kings. A good read on the term used for the 3 wise men/kings/magi is found by doing a Wikipedia search for "Biblical Magi".
-
Did you make any adjustments for the times the calendar has actually been changed since "those days"?
-
@OutlawGrrl It's important to remember that the first Zeitgeist "film" wasn't a documentary; it was the artistic expression of Peter Joseph. He has been very clear about that.
-
@ggcage u did not disprove zietgiest in this at all. nice try
-
@TheKoolic As a matter of fact, my librairy currently houses 1279 read books. Among these, 23 are religious "holy" books. I'm a scholar, are you? No. You are the ignorant fool here.
-
@ganondorf59 Have you ever read another book than the bible? If not you are even more ignorant but moreover arrogant towards life! Think about it, seriously!
-
Have you ever read another book than the bible? If not, you are even more ignorant but moreover arrogant! peace
Part I: While you make great facts, I must say that you are misleading just as Zeitgeist, especially when it comes to Astronomy & images of the sky at certain times & locations. Who said that Jesus was born in or next to Jerusalem? (Bethlehem of the Galilee is most likely the place, assuming Jesus ever existed). Who said that the story of Jesus was written during his life time or even close to it? You also seem to assume that the bible was never edited, which is now a historical fact.
andrewa312 2 months ago
@andrewa312
Part I
The NT was written in the first century. The First Epistle of Clement was an early church document known to have been written around AD 96. It makes references to several NT books and Jesus' divinity. Also, the apostles died for their witness of Jesus. They would've known whether or not they ate with and touched Jesus after He was crucified and resurrected, and they willingly gave their lives. Either Jesus really is the Son of God, or the apostles willingly died for a lie.
ggcage 2 months ago
@andrewa312
Part II
There is YouTube channel owned by William Lane Craig called "DrCraigVideos". He has some really good stuff on NT scholarship. However, even if the Bible was edited, that doesn't falsify Christianity. Christianity is true if Jesus really did resurrect, regardless of the Bible's inerrancy. As I mentioned before, the apostles died for their witness of the resurrection. Dr. Craig also has some very good stuff on the resurrection as well. I highly recommend you look at it.
ggcage 2 months ago