Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Halo na Geforce fx 5200

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,813
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 11, 2008

Rodando Halo em um pc com processador
pentium D 512mb ram geforce fx 5200 128mb




64 bits

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wtf... an geforce 2 ulta does a better job at games than this >.>

  • @capatais777 I agree that the ati drivers can be easily corrupted, I used to had a gtx 216. still a goo card however at that price I would look somewhere else.

    If I an nividia build, probably 4 580's 2 psus or something like that, its fine for now

  • @SparklesofUnity ATI RADEON IS A SHIT BROKEN EASY...

    NVIDIA FOREVER GTX

  • @capatais777 if you want to see the current system, its on my playlist, take a look. Its not done yet, its done for now though. thinking about putting a 5850, so now its 5970+5870+5850.

    Wont be till later though, also going for a 6th hdd in raid 0 as a project and doing some benchmarking.

  • @capatais777 your ego problem is very irrelevant to what I was mentioning before, I said I one time I owned this card. BTW for your information if you want to get very nasty: My current setup: I7 Xeon @ 4.3-4.4 ghz(h20) DDR3 kingston 2ghz 8-11-8 ati hd 5970 @ 1ghz(both cores/h20) ati hd 5870 @ 1.075ghz(h20) 5 wdd old raptors in raid 0 configuration 2 psu's. single rail, TWINS 64A+69A 3 radiators, thermolchill ta 4.120, ek coolstream 3.120, swifttech triple low profile rad.
  • @SparklesofUnity i SuPeR oWnEd YoU my 05/02/2010 computer is core 2 duo E7500 DUAL NUKE 2.930 GHz + 2.930 Ghz GeForce 9500 GT :P

  • @conyo985 yup, I owned the 5950 ultra at one time, not a bad card, the 9800xt was faster in terms of directx wise.

    the fx 5950 ultra had a 4X2 pixel pipeline, it wasnt a true 8 pixels per clock peak video card, unlike the 9800xt, which it did.

    and yes the old geforce ti series still whoops this card, not by much but still faster then this piece of crap.

    fx5200 is good for one thing, browsing the net, chatting,etc, for gaming forget it, unless your playing shitty ass resolution & settings.

  • @DuM4U

    Actually they do suck. I bought Geforce FX when they were the newest products from Nvidia. It was the weak pixel shader 2.0 performance that brought it down. When it was comapared to the Geforce 4 ti it didn't stood a chance and when it was compared from ATI's offering the 9000 series it was even worse. That's why when the 6 series came out Nvidia won back those disappointed with the FX.

  • they don't suck

    they are old

    lol

    stupied playboys ._.

    borned with his ass cleaned

  • a 4890 now can handle all games whiout problem, i have 9800gtx+ and i have 1920x1200, the only game i dont play at that resolutuin its crysis, just because i wanna very high :) i play gta iv at 1920x1200 at high whit 30 fps and more out of city places, cod 5 all max, resiudent evil 5 4x AA fear 2 max, fear max, cod 4 max and etc.... i will get a new card when i start having problmes to run games at lowest at 640x460 resulution xD like a 6200 now xD

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more