NASA Gravity Probe finds space-time vortex and proves Einstein was right!
Loading...
1,559
Loading...
Uploader Comments (nickharvey7)
see all
All Comments (33)
-
you have some great stuff here
-
interesting video and very informative
-
love the video really good
-
brilliant video
-
This is a great video
-
NASA and Einstein FAILS with Gravity Probe B tests. Let us assume everything that was said it right. That the Earth can rest on the 'Frame of the Universe' and is dragging in Space-Time. That means the Sun does the same being of greater gravitational force. Like a bowling ball on a giant rubber like sheet material. Anyone would assume the Earth a small ball, would be falling TOWARD the Sun because of the drag and the Sun's influence. EXCEPT THE EARTH IS MOVING AWAY FROM THE SUN. GRADE F-.
Loading...
some really good stuff here
prchecker 1 month ago
@prchecker Thanks! I am an artist and therefore outside of the scientific community so any help promoting this theory will be gratefully welcomed. Please share with your friends and add to your favorites. It would be nice to start a chain reaction of information a kind of quantum revolution!
nickharvey7 1 month ago
Everyone should look at Descartes Vortex theory. He didn't believe in any invisible force called gravity was part of why the planets revolve around the sun. What he believed was that there was an invisible (dark) matter the flowed in a vortex which explained why planets revolve around the sun.
thefranciswatts 2 months ago
@thefranciswatts Einstein never explained how mass curves spacetime in relativity, but in this theory objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because it has the slowest rate or flow of time. We have the principle of equivalence between gravity and acceleration because gravity is the same force as inertia.
nickharvey7 2 months ago
Nick, I've just recently found your channel (great!), but I have a question: Since really everything is relative to the observer, and the observer's perceptions are singular to that observer and cannot (within a 3D context) ever be truly conveyed/shared with a non-observer, isn't it then more/less impossible to come up with "proof" for much of this? The observer is never truly objective. Isn't everything a perception of possibility, really (in 3D)? Do you agree that science is moving (cont.)
tvswnet 8 months ago
@tvswnet I like the idea of mathematical proof as long as it is of something we can observer. What is happening now in science is that we are making up things to fit in with our mathematics, parallel universe, dark matter and energy. What we actually see is a process of continuous change or creation!
nickharvey7 8 months ago