i hope god showes he's self to u but i dont think u r a bad person i think that your just u even though i dont know u i still think of every one as they are not becuz of what they believe in bcuz its not right :D
If the definition of a word is mutable, meaning is not possible .. nor can logic be applied if definitions are not certain. The ability to precisely convey a concept depends on semantics.
Lacking a belief in God. Not believing in God. Believing that there is no God. Sounds the same to me. I think people just like to complicate things when it's really just this simple. It's the same thing.
@gklr Okay, that clears up your position, though it's still nitpicking semantics. As plainly shown with the apple example, you can clearly gain information by specifying something's limits (e.g. "not red", "less than 12" (not greater than 11), not flammable.
It also appears you're using a different version of "atheist" than the literal "without belief in a deity" meaning that most self-identified skeptical atheists seem to subscribe to.
no a real fantasy would be that the universe came from nowhere. That is what you believe right.
Normankay 3 months ago
@redshieldshatterer "Lacking a belief in God. Not believing in God. Believing that there is no God. Sounds the same to me."
The first two are the same and the third is different.
There are agnostic atheists who don't believe in any god but don't claim that there can be certainty of their non-existence.
There are gnostic atheists who don't believe in any god and claim that there can be certainty of their non-existence.
The latter then maybe "believes there's no god". The first doesn't.
doGoNsIylbaborPerehT 6 months ago
i hope god showes he's self to u but i dont think u r a bad person i think that your just u even though i dont know u i still think of every one as they are not becuz of what they believe in bcuz its not right :D
teniya15 7 months ago
If the definition of a word is mutable, meaning is not possible .. nor can logic be applied if definitions are not certain. The ability to precisely convey a concept depends on semantics.
MindRefined 7 months ago
Yo bitch I want you to respond to my comments make a video like the little kunt you are! Make a response bitch! Make a response!
123couchman 8 months ago
A lack of belief in god or not believing in god or no god is a way for creationists to argue the point.
This is because the creationists have no way of proving that there is no god except through a man authored book called "the bible".
maurieer 9 months ago
Lacking a belief in God. Not believing in God. Believing that there is no God. Sounds the same to me. I think people just like to complicate things when it's really just this simple. It's the same thing.
redshieldshatterer 9 months ago
" I want to know the thoughts of God. " - Albert Einstein
salomon109 10 months ago
@gklr Okay, that clears up your position, though it's still nitpicking semantics. As plainly shown with the apple example, you can clearly gain information by specifying something's limits (e.g. "not red", "less than 12" (not greater than 11), not flammable.
It also appears you're using a different version of "atheist" than the literal "without belief in a deity" meaning that most self-identified skeptical atheists seem to subscribe to.
vargonian 1 year ago