Woman In Scanner Photo Is DisInfo
Uploader Comments (Steeper33)
Top Comments
-
I agree with Steeper.. it is a "Big Deal", but if the photo is fake then its fake.. What we should do is take the time to look at some of the real examples of these photos and ask ourselves the very same questions while keeping in mind this is phase one! Whats next after this? Once this becomes ineffective will the quality get even better? Will it get easier and easier for them to intrude on our privace as we have already now been conditioned?
A Very Slippery Slope Here Folks!
All Comments (46)
-
anyone got any scanner porn?
-
dude, i dont care where they got these 2 pictures, its still an invasion of privacy, you CAN still see genitals and breasts... yes, you can. so stop being a fool. these things are a violation of privacy, end of story.
-
@EXOMATRlXTV you're the disinfo spreading bozo
-
@EXOMATRlXTV Exactly!! PLEASE help FIGHT to remove the TSA screeners.
Senator Mike Doherty (R-23) has an on-line petition
“Stop Invasive TSA Screening”
Google; Mike Doherty petition to read / sign it. THANK YOU.
TSA are ILLEGAL. DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
-
@Steeper33 whats the song? It sound like Tool, am I right?
-
Yea the real images you can see waaayyyy more nudity in detail
-
Yeah, this image isn't nearly as detailed as the real thing. Search YouTube for this one:
"BBC Look North - Newcastle Airport Installs Full Body Scanners 15th Dec 08"
-
What a bunch of communists,they pat down your 10 year old daughter or stare at her nude body..next they will be jammin their fat ugly fingers in every hole in her body..in the mean time they are letting fully clothed covered faced "you know who politically excused losers" walk past freely so as not to disturb their religious beliefs while they pack tons of explosives into the cargo hold or pay some TSA 10 dollar an hour labourer to do it for them..THEY ARE LAUGHING AT YOU AMERICA
-
I've said it before, I'll say it again: Dogs do a better job. They are cheaper, more effective and many times faster--oh yes, and less invasive. This is 100% about lobbyists in Washington. Apparently dogs don't have lobbyists. No one is going to make piles of money on dogs--too hard to package!
-
Good one.
The point is making money, and training people to be slaves to the State. Submit! It's for your own good, you basterds!!!
Meanwhile, that State continues to fail every day to kill the Terrorists off, who are the real bad guys, NOT US!
These scanners should be in prisons, not airports.
I and others will not accept this, even if we have to bankrupt every Airline to do it. Flying the Hindenberg would be more fun, and a LOT more dignified.
ok, if it is "no big deal" then let all celebs, kings & queens, Obama + Wife + children etc. etc. go through the Terr Herz Scanner which also have an effect on DNA according to MIT: 'Naked Scanners Unzip Your DNA' watch?v=HXkqRLAPn8M
EXOMATRlXTV 2 years ago 16
@EXOMATRlXTV
It is a big deal, but we can't support disinfo with this photo.
Steeper33 2 years ago
Amazing how much dis-info is passed around by "patriots".
Beacons that were not RFID, "blackmail", and others.
The scanners are bad enough without people f*cking up others perceptions of validity when the BS gets found out.
bigc028282 2 years ago
@bigc028282
Filtering out disinfo is the process of searching for truth. This definitely is an example to be careful in what is passed around. Just because this was found to be a fraud, doesn't mean there is not serious issues with privacy. It's also degrading.
Steeper33 2 years ago 3