Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ozzybanoswald Vs the Truth of 911

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
377 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 20, 2009

Now I'm being attacked by "No Plane, its all CGI" theory folk over genghis6199, who is a serious 911 investigator and a real person, which is more than we can say for Killtown. There are a small but significant number of individuals asserting ALL the 911 media evidence is fake. CGI, faked video or taken from the hands of the video tapers and altered by the perpetrators of 911 and then released thru the media outlets. This is absurd. These people attack excellent investigative reports and documentaries not conforming to "No Plane Theory". Genghis6199 is a well known producer of 911 analysis videos. I'm not getting into the "Why", here, if you have investigated the subject seriously you probably know this stuff Does occur. However, The media IS involved in covering up the Truth of 911. There Are altered videos. Some of these altered videos are still believed by the vast majority of the public to be true. Just as many believe the WTC collapse is explained by the subsequent 911 investigation. 911 was an inside job and a media job. But a "Plane" did enter the WTC. It was not Flt175. It was not like any plane we are familiar with despite it's appearance. I am not sure any serious investigator can say "What" hit the WTC. But it wasn't Flt175

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (IExposeMormonism)

  • There where NO airliners hijacked on 9/11/2001

  • @DeepSpace8andahalf But planes hit the WTC. Maybe not a production line Boeing, but planes looking like them. No plane theory doesn't fly. And the Harley Guy is Mark Walsh, AKA Psycho Mark, on a radio show. See Falcon6073 account for more Truth. Ozzy et al are a psyop

  • @IExposeMormonism The fact is that if ANYTHING struck the targets on 9/11/2001

    it would have to be MISSILES because commercial airliners do NOT behave as MISSILES

    they where NOT designed to penetrate targets and there is NO precedent data from ANY

    airliner crash that is even similar to the penetration witnessed in the case of the 9/11/2001

    FALSE FLAG ATTACK.

  • @DeepSpace8andahalf I'd agree with that:: The planes behaved like missiles, not Boeing airplanes. So, is Mark Walsh just another guy that was hypnotized by the scum on TV feeding us those pat lines Mark used?

  • do you still hear fom spiney extras? that's interesting

  • @genghis6l99 I just dropped by there Sunday and was looking around. I was making a more extensive list of "them":: bunnie4carrot etc, etc.

see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @IExposeMormonism I really can't say if he was coerced into supporting the official line, or he was recruited & paid to say what he said. however, it is obvious that having a pat statement like that right after the event speaks volumes about the individual delivering the "info".

  • LEAVE OZZY ALONE

  • KV8RI WD9RS NL8RNº !!!

    Scott Hill Baker !!!

    WQ2RX !!!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more