911 Television Bloopers 10 aka September Clues addendum Chapter 1

the question is: WHO REALLY ARE THE TERRORISTS?

THIS IS A REPOST OF SIMONSHACK'S September Clues.
REPOST EVERYWHERE!
New SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info

No videos of the 9/11 events can be trusted. Not even the shots depicting the tower collapses.

Here is the proof.

Various techniques were used to 'sell' the events of 9/11 with computer-generated imagery.

In my September Clues research, it was demonstrated that all existing videoclips showing 'airplanes' striking the Twin Towers are forgeries. That should of course suffice to call the entire 9/11 TV 'coverage' a total fraud. However, this 'Addendum' to September Clues serves to understand just how much of the 9/11 TV hoax relied on fake, manipulated or even pre-fabricated imagery.

Before you comment on this latest study, ask yourself one simple question :

Would it have been wise for the 9/11 planners to rig power explosives (or use any sort of weaponry) to bring down the WTC complex - and let anyone capture these erratic 'fireworks' on film? Would they not ensure that the DEPICTION of this high-risk demolition-job be kept away from public view - and instead offer the World TV audience 'safe', artificial visuals of the day's events ? Plain logic suggests that, given the magnitude of this operation and the resources available to their planners, all risk factors would have been kept to a bare minimum : all the available technology would have been employed towards achieving this end.

Of course, the WTC towers must have blown up in a spectacular manner - but not quite in the manner seen on TV : in reality, a thick smokescreen probably impeded any clear view of their demise which was never recorded on film. In fact, dozens of charred stationary vehicles were found on all streets leading to the WTC ( way out of reach of any falling debris ). One may reasonably speculate they were set on fire to help blocking the visuals of the WTC during the odd hour preceding their collapse.

To be sure, the available collapse videos depict physically impossible events and have, to this day, effectively confounded any scientific calculations - as they are based on fictitious imagery. However, foul play can be fully demonstrated by exposing the glaring discrepancies between the videos themselves : they contain verifiable, repeatable and demonstrable proof - and as such constitute eminently court-admissible evidence.




ABOUT EMP/HERF(or HPM) electromagnetic weaponry :
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/biomedic...
There can be no denying that the development of EMP/HERF technology has been a strategic military priority over the last decades. One of the main features of EMP/HERF weapons is their ability to disrupt - selectively - the enemy's electronic systems. In this video, I contend / postulate that this technology was likely used to disrupt temporarily videocamera circuitries in the Manhattan area. It has been counter-argued that this would have caused all sorts of disruptions in other electronic appliances. Not necessarily so : the disruptive frequencies can be selectively calibrated to affect a specific range of devices. An EMP/HERF diffuser might have been placed, say, on top of WTC7 and tested well beforehand. Nevertheless - and interestingly - we know that lenghty cellphone blackouts occured on the day and that firefighters' radio-transmitters also malfunctioned : one could reasonably speculate this was due to some 'bleeding' of the EMP/HERF jamming-beams , thus affecting similar HZ-range electronics.

Theoretically, a total videocamera jamming/blackout was only needed for a few, crucial seconds of the day (tower strikes+tower collapses). Nevertheless, it seems likely it was applied throughout the 102 minutes of the morning events (+ in the afternoon at the time of the WTC7 collapse ) to prevent any private footage to record the events as they unfolded IN REALITY.

In any event, it should be clear that the various videos betray irreconcilable discrepancies. It is up to everyone's logic to make sense out of the imagery we were fed on 9/11by the major TV networks. With the available evidence now at hand, the most reasonable conclusion is that most - if not all - of the 9/11 TV 'newscasts' were but a series of pre-fabricated, digital fabrications.

For more info & updates about this ongoing research, please go to :
http://forum.911movement.org/index.ph...

I post at that forum under the name 'socialservice'

Thanks for your interest and support of my research.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• Television
• Bloopers
• 10
• aka
• September
• Clues
• addendum
• Chapter

[4everUSNavy]

1. thats a news helicopter, if seen the Availible footage from it.

you need to rely on facts, not what some pussy tells you.

god you have to much time on your hands, get a real life. Become a MARINE thats where its at bitch.

[flatulencer]

Good Luck

avenge the USS Liberty June 8, 1967!

gtr5(dotcom)

semper fi!

[4everUSNavy]

you think you know everything. thats just like you liberal cunts.

you think that you are the only right people, and dont even listen to what other have to say, its hard enough to live without you fucking it up.

USS LIBERTY i admit, big fake but goverment didnt do a good job at covering it up

[flatulencer]

Although you just turned 17, and just enlisted, you are an ambassador representing The Marine Corp. Wildly flailing away by flinging verbal feces like a crazed chimpanzee embarrasses all you associate with.

Good Luck adjusting in boot camp!

Avenge the USS Liberty June 8, 1967!

gtr5(dotcom)

Semper fi!

[4everUSNavy]

I hope you know that we have turned the tide in the war in afghanistain. we now have taken back stratigic positions and strongholds. we have pushed out nearly all taliban and al-queda members.

son... we could win the conflict and bring our boys home

[flatulencer]

The young Icarus has composed himself, or has someone else joined in the discussion? Either way, let's try to get you up to speed. Listen to "A Marines Disquisition" with host Drew Raines with Bob Chapman on Thursdays on blogtalkradio with replays on clipster and youtube via TheBobChapmanChannel. Watch "Wake Up Call" Remastered by JohnNada80. Google "Crack the CIA" by Guerilla News and "Lt. Col. Bo Gritz claims CIA drug dealing".

[flatulencer]

Watch "The President Who Told The Truth" by NufffRespect and "NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - sensitive information enclosed".

There is none so blind as those who refuse to see!

Avenge the USS Liberty June 8, 1967!

gtr5(dotcom)

Semper fi!

[CNN911Fakes]

Indeed, "pat,"

The ony reality of 911 was TV fakery.

[brettiphone4]

although i believe this is nonsense the "be a marine" guy needs to kill himselff! all the "marines" have ever done is play a part in murdering the innocent to line their governments pockets with gold via oil seizure! get your own mind you fucking retard!

[katiemilker]

As soon as I heard about the twin towers and pentagon I said immediately "that Bush is a cunt", I know straight away by pure gut feeling that George Bush Jr was part of this, if no one can remember Bush was going to be kicked out of the white house just before 911, he was going to be put before court for rigging the election, 911 happened and everyone forgot it's that simply, now he's in Dubai probably sucking off king Abdullah along with his daddy the old head of the see eye A, disgraceful.

[drifter402]

the heli at the beggining disapeared cuz of the zoom out. this happens with the fox shot of the 2nd plane if u watch it in hd. 911 was an inside job BUT THERE WERE PLANES

[ganzegal77]

Inside Job 100 % !!!!!!!!!!!

[AJollyGoodFelon]

I don't think this is very weighty evidence because when you change the angle of view the distances and angles will change just like pointed out. The smoke appearance was convincing but could it be wide aspect ratio? There is independenc footage that has been published that shows the IR laser targeting dot that guides the 2nd plane in. (the third plane never showed up, it defected like the 2nd plane did also. The 2nd plane we saw hit towers was backup plan B military plane (laser guided)

[4everUSNavy]

@Masterkohatu

last time a i remember. the NYPD and NYFD were already there before tower 2 got hit.

and you do realise its doesnt take a few minutes to mobilize right????

[Masterkohatu]

@4everUSNavy i am not to sure about the us marines or the us military defense as a whole with the 9/11 incident yous didn't even think to keep yourselves protected while in training? no one watching no one on call no code to change the training exercise because yous were under real attack?? nothing i wouldn't be so proud of that

[Masterkohatu]

@flatulencer for me it just comes down to logic thinking to many coincidences in the 9/11 incident

1. no norad the americans had no defences to watch the sky had they forgot about pearl harbour already??

2. 2 150story building hit from different sides and falling nearly at the same time and in the very much the same way straight down??? But wouldn't they buckle from the point of impact where the planes had initially hit them being the weakest part of the building now?

there are so many more

[b1gfut007]

hahahaha the whole thing just makes me laff, i think im going crazy yeah