X-15-1 VC (v1.1) for Flight Simulator Video - Long Version

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
45,005
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 17, 2008

9-minute X-15-1 VC (v1.1) video, from "takeoff" to landing at Edwards AFB, captured in Microsoft Flight Simulator X.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • That was an odd sound a 6:00

  • first of all its droped from a plane like a gyder it doesnt take off

see all

All Comments (74)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It could take off from the ground if it had wheels and a long enough runway. Would be very risky, major unneccesary waste of power, but possible. "Google and see..."

  • The X-15 has only fuel for 3 Minutes and it doesn't start vom the ground. Fail!

  • Hard landing, hehe :-\

  • @Applesoop24 sounds like a fart exhausting

  • ...and in the few years since FSX and X Planes 9 what's changed.

    Not much???

    This is a cool cartoon but that's all it is.

    It the same with train, road vehicle and watercraft simulators, none are especially accurate in their dynamics. But their aproximate dynamics are better than nothing.I'll replicate accurate X15 flights on my sim when I get the X15+ play about ,such as supersonic flight at very low altitude ( which of course is totally unsealistic)THAT'S HOW YOU SIM in 2011(in 2050??)

  • I raced one of my friends in one of these on multiplayer. He was in a F-16 and I was in the X-15. I kicked his ass, I did 2894 KIAS while he only did 1003 KIAS. Lol.

  • go to 3:40 for takeoff

  • everybody talkin about that sound at 6:00 that is the fuel exhausting

  • It's a shame that the absolute velocity hard coded limit of 2666kts imposed in at least FS2002, was STILL kept in place in FS2004 AND now FSX -  means that a plane like the X-15 cannot be accurately simulated.

    2666kts was barely mach 5 if the air temp was really cold, or on average M4.9ish.

    Seeing a the X-15 went well in excess of M6 !!! That was a bit of a cop out by Microsoft. Also, in the 'engine type' in the cfg & air file, a rocket engine could be specified, but no params exist to work it.

  • man uu needa get laid

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more