Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

[UPDATED] radioactivity on video - just like inside chernobyl

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
14,309
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 10, 2009

i filmed multiple radioactive sources (see video for details) with my webcamera. i took the camera apart to expose the CCD, removing the glass that covers it - thus allowing even the alpha particles to strike the photo chip... with outstanding results!

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (bionerd23)

  • could a thorium doped lens damage a camera sensor? I have 2 radioactive lens (rokkor 58mm f/1.2 and an old canon s.s.c. 35mm f/2), I'm a bit scared to use them after watching this :\

  • @quaxk

    not really. only if you'd leave a film (!) in an old analog camera for a long time (weeks), it might get exposed by the radiation, and image quality will be reduced.

  • This is very interesting, you can measure radiation with a webcam, ok i got it that you need to remove the plastic case but how you you make the grey background?

  • @ovnismx

    by simply using it in the dark. ;)

    if it wasnt just "dim lights" but instead "total darkness", i guess you'd even have a BLACK background! \o/

  • That's awesome. Did you remove the foil on the Am-241 source? In the US, the smoke detector cores have a gold foil layer (or something) on them. I've heard it kills the alpha output, but it didn't for Rutherford's gold foil experiment?

    Also, I did try the ZnS phosphor screen thing, and didn't get very good results; maybe my screen was too thick or something as I know it works with a spinthariscope, but I couldn't see anything even with a generation 2 image intensification tube.

  • @lollazers

    there's only a gold foil layer on the back, at least in the one i used. the front is "clean" and pure Am-241. :)

    however, VERY thing gold foil (and other foils) are penetratable by alpha radiation, so it depends, i guess.

Top Comments

  • I like very much the way you act: you're only basing on science, not like irrational people who're living in scare tanks to their deep ignorance... Well done and many thanks for your very interesting videos! :-)

  • That was an awesome demonstration.

    with some effort, you could create permanent images on a ccd using a perforated sheet of metal as a radiation mask, cross hairs or your signature for example.

Video Responses

This video is a response to The "Webcam" vs. the "Particle Beam"
see all

All Comments (103)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • great video! I really liked it, I guess if I ever get a radioactive source I need to keep it away from my Nikon lol. There's something exciting about the fact that you can actually DESTROY something with the radiation by yourself, isn't it? :)

  • you know this chick is awesome in the sack

  • You need to watch some of the better documentaries on Chernobyl, and then you'l maybe realize you are toying with your future health.

  • @megahosters You would get an ionized eye

  • what about Samarium

  • 2:23 is that mean that this meal very radioactive?

  • If I took apart a smoke detector and put the Am-241 to my eyeball would I get cancer or die?

  • think about space probes, they have to tolerate hundreds of thousands times more radiation and still have working CCDs!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more