Couric Stumps Palin With Supreme Court Question, Extended Version

Are there societal consequences of America's gun laws?

If you kill a person, including your own child (in whatever stage of development) then of course the government should butt in.

As for gay marriage, there are societal consequences there. Kids have enough sexual confusion growing up, we should not include the question "will I marry a man or a woman?" in that.

Big Government should butt out of our lives .
Oh oh oh , except when it comes to what a woman does with her own body or who people should be allowed to marry.

LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, REAL ESTATE FRAUD

The Defendants had fraudulently pretended frivolity of Plaintiffs allegations of fraudulent Lee County ownership claims. Defendants concealed that Lee County never had any title to Plaintiff(s) Gulf-front Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A and that the public record had conclusively established Lee Countys forgeries. See facially forged Lee County parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 & 07-44-21-01-00001.0000 and forged claim O.R. 569/875.

She thinks that abortion rights should be left up to the states because she's a federalist, but she favors a federal ban on gay marriage? Unbelievable

Joe Biden is a liar. He said "conservative scholar". Come on Joe. We know they're nowhere to be seen. If there was a conservative scholar, scholar meaning intelligent, they'd be labeled "too liberal" by the right wing

It was easier than to say, "You still don't understand what she said." She was saying the supreme court has no business in those issues. That's inconceivable to you, evidently.  Also, I never insulted you and you've insulted me three times. Way to be a MASSIVE hypocrite.

I never said you insulted me, actually, I was referring to the first comment you made directed at someone else, now invisible due to rate downs. Good imagination though. It would be all well and good if that's what Palin was trying to say, however if it was indeed what she was getting at then it would have been supremely easy and enlightening to offer an example and say why they had no business in it. She did not, because she is uneducated on the issues. The woman is utterly incompetent.

Man, you seriously have to look at it from her angle. Or I guess "our angle". Have you ever argued with someone you knew would never agree with you, that had tons of resources, maybe that was putting you on the spot? I've never fought back under such circumstances, I just avoid it. I don't know how to better explain it. You can see the interviewer handling the two VP candidates completely differently. This is overly hostile for no reason other than one side has too much power.

Wow, completely over your head too. That's amazing. So you think the only way to combat government influence is more government influence? The answer to every question isn't "have the government fix it".