Couric Stumps Palin With Supreme Court Question, Extended Version
Top Comments
All Comments (2,061)
-
Thank you for posting this, tpmtv.
-
@Angryblacksign Fredom of speech, unless you wanna elect people like her that will take that away too.
-
@Angryblacksign Take your personal crap out on somebody else.
-
@edenstore If you're a person who sides with Palin, I want you to stay away from our schools and my children
-
I fail to see how Palin was "stumped" by the question. She gave an answer that was legitimate. Biden seemed more the dummy--talking about representing a consensus among this "heterogenous society." The court's job is not to issue decisions that reflect the current people.
-
Mr. McCain are you sure this unknown governor from Alaska will be helpful to your campaign?
Well, I'm hoping that all the men will want to pork her bad enough to not pay attention to what comes out of her mouth as much as what they would like to put in it.
I don't know, men doing something that they probably shouldn't just because their dick is telling them? That doesn't sound likely to happen.
59,934,814 people voted for McCain/Palin
-
The government needs to stay out of my life and Joe Biden needs to stay out of the government.
-
#t=3m2s The sound of defeat
@jpsartrean, yes, a federalist is in favor of a strong, centralized authority, yet also one that grants wide deference to the states, provinces, etc., on some issues.
This can't be one of those issues because states cannot legislate your federal rights.
She's an asshat.
RebelGuy95 8 months ago 13
@jpsartrean, Marbury v. Madison set precedent for what was already implied by the Constitution..."it's the emphatic duty of the Court to say what the law is...."
It is not judicial activism to interpret the document on an issue that it is silent on.
Judicial activism, for example, was Brown v. Board of Education, for precedent had been set that racist segregation was okay...the activist Court corrected that morally bankrupt position in Plessy.
RebelGuy95 8 months ago 6