Truth is, u dont understand shit. U always just fall back on ur first statement like it actually means something. Ur point maybe historical fact but, again, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. I was talking about the quran being burned and its impact on society. U just keep spewing the same shit over and over again. U have no arguement. Thats my point. Do u understand now? With that said, i think ive wasted enough of my time talking to ur stupid ass. Good day.
I understand your comments completely. They do not refute my argument. My argument is based on historical fact. You have done nothing to dispute the verity of these facts, nor have you shown that the logic connecting them is faulty. No matter how many times you repeat it, your claim that there is no connection is mere contradiction and not an argument at all.
What exactly do u not understand about my comments? U never acknowledge anything except ur own points. Thats fucking retarded. I refuted ur comments about the correlation between burning the quran and the book/people burning. There is no correlation... And u continue to regurgitate the same bullshit in every single one of ur comments. Please, if u have something new to say, say it. If not, spare urself the embarrassment and STFU... Good Day
I refuse to address your comments about "continued exist for the quran", because they make no sense. My comment was a general condmenation of book burning, pointing out the historcal connection between burning books and burning people. You chose to interpret that as support for the Quran. I am not responsible for your misinterpretation of my argument. You could use some lessons in elementary logic. And history.
U didnt address anything i just said. U still stuck on ur point from ur first posting... Is that all u have to say? Do u honestly think a rational person can debate someone who is irrational? Debating a muslim is like debating a creationist, u cant tell them anything cuz they already know. Its in the holy book. As far as im concerned, if u support continued exist for the quran, u support barbarism. Now address that or STFU...
Wow! I love your sense of humor. Passive aggresive, i get accused of that too, but I like your way better. Thanks for the educational video.
dcladual 1 month ago
The only thing i truly consider a sin is to destroy knowledge
ancientshogun 1 year ago
Love your video. Agree 100%
CaptainKasen 1 year ago
Watch TheAmazingAtheist's video where he burns the koran. It's pretty damn funny.
TairyGreen89 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
Do it !
MrJurekGG 1 year ago
@pirbird14
Truth is, u dont understand shit. U always just fall back on ur first statement like it actually means something. Ur point maybe historical fact but, again, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. I was talking about the quran being burned and its impact on society. U just keep spewing the same shit over and over again. U have no arguement. Thats my point. Do u understand now? With that said, i think ive wasted enough of my time talking to ur stupid ass. Good day.
AtheistJuggernaut 1 year ago
@AtheistJuggernaut
I understand your comments completely. They do not refute my argument. My argument is based on historical fact. You have done nothing to dispute the verity of these facts, nor have you shown that the logic connecting them is faulty. No matter how many times you repeat it, your claim that there is no connection is mere contradiction and not an argument at all.
pirbird14 1 year ago
@pirbird14
What exactly do u not understand about my comments? U never acknowledge anything except ur own points. Thats fucking retarded. I refuted ur comments about the correlation between burning the quran and the book/people burning. There is no correlation... And u continue to regurgitate the same bullshit in every single one of ur comments. Please, if u have something new to say, say it. If not, spare urself the embarrassment and STFU... Good Day
AtheistJuggernaut 1 year ago
@AtheistJuggernaut
I refuse to address your comments about "continued exist for the quran", because they make no sense. My comment was a general condmenation of book burning, pointing out the historcal connection between burning books and burning people. You chose to interpret that as support for the Quran. I am not responsible for your misinterpretation of my argument. You could use some lessons in elementary logic. And history.
pirbird14 1 year ago
@pirbird14
U didnt address anything i just said. U still stuck on ur point from ur first posting... Is that all u have to say? Do u honestly think a rational person can debate someone who is irrational? Debating a muslim is like debating a creationist, u cant tell them anything cuz they already know. Its in the holy book. As far as im concerned, if u support continued exist for the quran, u support barbarism. Now address that or STFU...
AtheistJuggernaut 1 year ago