Gail Riplinger and the Bible 1: Introduction

My introduction to the series on Gail Riplinger's "New Age Bible Versions"

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Jesus
• Christ
• Christian
• Christianity
• Bible
• Biblical
• Scripture
• Scriptural
• church
• Catholic
• Catholicism
• Orthodox
• Orthodoxy
• Anglican
• Anglicanism
• King
• James
• Gail
• Riplinger
• New
• Age
• Versions

[Mechanized0]

@toobfunnybunny Indeed. It is extremely overdue. However, I do wish Albert would continue this series. While he may consider it as "shooting fish in a barrel" he should be aware just how many individuals place trust in Riplinger's thesis.

[Mechanized0]

@vachief Having read Gail Riplinger's book it should be easy to understand that Albert's videos successfully debunked her claims, particularly as it pertains to the conspiracy angle of her thesis.

[toobfunnybunny]

this is a terrific series! thanks so much for taking the time to do it. it is long overdue.

[saeguy22]

The Bible warns us about people like you who will call evil good. Only the Lord gives understanding to His word so I am not surprised you don't understand. Its not certain how much they paid you for this job here but believe me, its not worth it considering the Judgement that will rain down from above on the Day of The Lord.

[brainouty]

@bbbfohio No, the ignorant person is you. You masquerade as if you can read Greek, and you wouldn't know Greek if it bit you. Take my Alexandrian text challenge just posted 8/30/10, lets see if you can pass it, LIAR.

You can't even properly read a pronomial suffix. Or you'd NEVER EVER claim that Psalm 12:7 refers to 'words' in verse 6. After I'm finished chewing up edward's anti-semitic claim the LXX is a fraud, you're the next fraud to expose.

[truevineinfantry]

SIXHUNDRED THREESCORE and SIX

[parisreidhead]

Which liberal bible college are u from

[mark0454]

@vachief Friend, I leave you with this. If you are going to take on this KJV only battle that you have waged, you first must wage your own private battle-ignorance. Please do not take offense, but you simply do not know the mechanism of how you got the KJV and others got their versions.

You don't need to know Greek and Hebrew, only the history of the translations and who did what. You lack of knowledge in these areas is obvious in your comments.

[mark0454]

@vachief There is an old expression: There are two things you do not want to watch made-sausage and laws. Well I would add to that Bible translation. When open up the word of God in our hands, few have any idea what went into bringing it to us in so many readable forms, and the miracle of its preservation. We love the Bible that we read that gives us comfort and strength, regardless of which version.

[mark0454]

@vachief You need to understand how the KJV was written. It was 95% a rewrite of the Coverdayle Bible. They took the Coverdale, Bishop's, Geneve, Great, Matthews, Douay-Rheims Latin Vulgate and "formulated" the New Testament. They tranlated the Greek Septuegant and Latin Vulgate into the Old Testament.

This vision of 47 men sitting around deciphering 5300 manuscrips is simply that-a dream.