This video shows the progress down our rural driveway and our Keep Out Signs. A normal person would find it difficult NOT to see our signs. For a trained observer, such as a Sheriff's Deputy it would be impossible not to see our signs. Of course, there are a couple of exceptions that would allow the Sheriff's Deputy to advance onto our property and intentionally ignore our signs: Has a warrant, Has probable cause. The Sheriff's Deputy stated that he had no warrant and as you are able to see it would be nearly impossible to view a crime in progress from the county road as our driveway is over one quarter mile long. There are no laws that would allow the Social Service workers to invade private property with posted Keep Out signs. The Social Service Workers vehicle led the Sheriff's Deputy Vehicle onto our property in complete violation of both State Statutes and Colorado Constitutional Law. Learn more about the usurpation of private property rights, gun rights and a civilized society in Adams County Colorado at : http://NoJustice.KrakatoaRanch.com
I have read every scrap of the web page this man has put up and from what i read this was just the saddest thing anyone has ever had to go through. Not only with his eldest kid but how anyone can say anything about you and take away years of you're life. if i had found this a year ago i would have been on the first flight to stand beside him on his court date. I say good luck to you and best wishes to you're wife and kids. (and who knows maybe one day she will see what she did was wrong).
MrMikethemaster 7 months ago
Sue the bastards!!
dshedder1 8 months ago
@BloatedSensations ..in case you were wondering, yes I intentionally misspelled "selectively" and "illiterate".
mapache11 1 year ago
You seem to be selectiviely illieterate. The last line of my previous post was "The police and social services have a job to do. They happened to go about it the wrong way in this case but they had a reason to be at that house."
Where have I ever said that the police were correct in this case?? My original point was that they had a reason to go there and the guy who posted the video does not mention why..unless the viewer goes to the link.
mapache11 1 year ago
@mapache11 "There are dozens of less regulated countries in the world that you are free to move to." - Umm... aren't YOU the one arguing FOR less regulation?!?!?! I mean, you seem to be in favor of government agents having the ability to act in any manner they may choose based solely on the requisite that they perceive that they "have a job to do." Perhaps you should visit some of the places you mention. I'm sure you'll find their methods of policing, at least, much to your approval!
BloatedSensations 1 year ago
@mapache11 "The police get a call about it. You wouldn't want them to investigate it?" - Investigate? Sure. Force entry onto property, which has clear notice posted, acting on something like an anonymous call? Absolutely not. The SC has ruled - and rightly so - that an anonymous tip is not enough to support probable cause. Now, if they have valid probable cause that a crime is being committed, that's an entirely different matter. That WAS NOT the case in this instance.
BloatedSensations 1 year ago
@mapache11 Myanmar? Never been. I did spend 9 days in Rwanda, 3 weeks in Lebanon, 2 weeks in the Philippines, and a week in Thailand, (I spent about 4 hours in jail in that last one for a speeding ticket! It's actually a very funny story.) along with a couple of other places. (I used to be employed as a photographer with the Canadian government) Where have you been?
BloatedSensations 1 year ago
@BloatedSensations ...tyranny?? Statements like that are invariably made by people who have never seen it.
I suggest a quick trip to Myanmar.
There are dozens of less regulated countries in the world that you are free to move to. You'll find, however, that there is a direct correlation between your freedom to do whatever you like and the lack of infrastructure. Haiti, El Salvador, Belize or Guyana (in case you don't speak French or Spanish) are in your hemisphere.
mapache11 1 year ago
@BloatedSensations ... You obviously miss the point. Let me make it clearer for you. Someone is doing something illegal at their house. Like making child porn. Maybe using your daughter, niece, whatever. The police get a call about it. You wouldn't want them to investigate it? Even if it turned out to be an ex wife angry at her spouse??
The police and social services have a job to do. They happened to go about it the wrong way in this case but they had a reason to be at that house.
mapache11 1 year ago
@mapache11 "What if he is making child porn there, or has his wife tied up in the barn?" - What if YOU are doing the same? "What if" is no basis for granting legal authority to search, harass and ignore laws and civil rights... unless, of course, you actually like living under the dictate of a tyrannical state.
BloatedSensations 1 year ago