The People's Court- "Not Returning Property" Part 2 [Milk cans cause contractual mess!]

No description available.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• the
• people
• peoples
• person
• persons
• court
• room
• courtroom
• judge
• law
• lawyer
• plaintiff
• defendant
• litigants
• no
• not
• return
• returning
• returned
• property
• milk
• jugs
• paint
• artists
• jars
• cans
• studio
• display
• sale
• money
• monies
• dollars
• store
• decor
• consignment
• rusted
• pay
• paying
• paid
• agreement
• decoration
• stuff
• items
• business
• customer
• antique
• deal
• commission

[irvingklaw57]

The cans didn't sell because they are ridiculously over priced, not because the economy. I hate when antique store owners blame they're woes on eveything else, disregard that they're crap is over priced. Stick to thrift stores.

[AnnMeadows7]

no wonder it never sold. 750? 500? way too steep for that "artwork"

[fetishisticrose]

art is subjective...don't be so harsh

[duntzwitch]

This is the first time I've literally laughed out loud while watching The People's Court: 1) The verdict (I did not see that coming), 2) the plaintiff's luck while walking out of the building (did not see that coming either). LOLOL

[AshyHusky1]

shut up Judge let them speak

[soccergurl36]

@seka1986

$500 for the pair. not a single

[gh3rocksmylife2]

@seka1986 unless a crazy fanatic wants em

[seka1986]

No one will ever pay $500 for a milk can, never.

[imaginator09]

The defendant is a jerk.

[MrJlo87]

Omg what a wierd case. JM ruling was great. that was more the fair, it made it not so much about a dollar about just ach take one and sell it for what you can, dont get much fairer then that. And the guy got $250 walking out the door! The other guy shouldhave chased the buyer down and said buy my can too!!!

[mishmash01234]

They should have just let one of those people outside who thinks they're worth $500 buy them. Problem solved!