FOX News Bias? Richard Dawkins Vs Bill O'Reilly on 'The O'Reilly Factor'
Top Comments
All Comments (1,023)
-
The only bias in the media is pro-Illuminati anti-Christianity.
-
Wow, not sure I've ever heard anyone quite so dumb as oreilly
-
Kid stop crying. why it says Atheist? because thats what he is, The title of his book is more Atheist than Scientific
Also you feel the need to lie? Crusades and witch hunts are not taught in the Bible.
Just a silly kid arn't u
Richard dawkins best eplanation for life was Aliens, he said so himself, even thou there is no evidence at all for aliens, but i guess its ok because Atheists jump blindly from one bandwagon to the next
-
@PokeZelda6664 Biased? What makes you say that? #FauxNews
-
Fox News?
BIASED?
-
O'Reilly is utterly infuriating and a complete idiot! Nothing he says has any logic whatsoever and I'm sure how Richard Dawkins had the patience to go on his show! O'Reilly would be absolutley slaughtered in the uk and would be a laughing stock. Maybe Fox needs to employ someone who's actually capable of having a conversation rather than this complete dimwit!
-
@Researchrules Well as I said, I don't know if he does do first-hand research, but seeing that he was for many years a professor at Oxford, does that not imply that he satisfactorally met that quota? Also, I don't think he is charismatic at all. If he were charismatic, he wouldn't make such bold, frank, sometimes just rude statements towards theists. I'd rather think that literary skill is his best characteristic, after his intelligence.
-
@vandbg Any professor in Academia has a H quotient applied to his or hers research. That quotient is obtained through quantitative research, not qualitative one. Imagine a historian probing through secondary sources without a look onto primary ones and archeology. He is charismatic, which is essential for Academia, but scientific research implies you to rerun experiments, not multiply the H quotient of the authors of the said experiments.
-
@Researchrules I don't see why not actually looking down a microscope every day dequalifies him as an evolutionary biologist, no. A historian doesn't have to dig up pots in Northumbria to be a historian. A physicist doesn't have to press buttons at CERN to be a physicist. What's your point? (And I'm assuming that he doesn't partake in 'scientific research' personally. In all honesty I don't really know)
@xuphoriaa I'm not angry at all... the only one that looks angry to me is you! ex: "FAGGOT FAGGOT THIS ISN'T WORTH NEW ATHEIST BE PROUD OF UR FAITH BE PROUD KEEP UR CHIN UP DO U REALIZE UR GONNA DIE ATHEISTS"...and... "or you faggots who are never grateful to him"... What ever happened to love thy neighbor? You're a hypocrite and an idiot! Stop asking me dumb questions like, who do you think god let out... There is no "christisn" god. He didn't let out anyone ya dumb gullible cunt! Now fack off!
TheManInBlack2003 4 months ago 4
@xuphoriaa Okay, well if you're going to continue to preach and not give any evidence or even attempt to form a coherent argument I'll choose not to, then.
vandbg 4 months ago 3