con esa potencia y torque se traga completito a la amarok, toyota, ford ranger, a todas solo hay que ver el precio ....de la camioneta...chevrolet colorado es una buena opcion y todavia es 2.8 cm de motor mas ahorrativo que uno de 3.0 turbo diseel comom rail no pasa nada...
i like the look of the ford ranger..
xr8dpixel 3 months ago
con esa potencia y torque se traga completito a la amarok, toyota, ford ranger, a todas solo hay que ver el precio ....de la camioneta...chevrolet colorado es una buena opcion y todavia es 2.8 cm de motor mas ahorrativo que uno de 3.0 turbo diseel comom rail no pasa nada...
cesarse1a 4 months ago
To add insult in injury. They will pitch the Colorado top spec at the same price as a Ford Ranger.
Beggars belief
OssieLad64 4 months ago
Colorado vs Ranger
1. Smaller motor
2. Far less power and torque
3. Carries less weight in it's tray
4. Towing capability is way short
5. Has a bland interior
6. Has Blue tooth only as an option
7. Has gps navigation as an option
8. Has less room in the rear leg room
8 reasons you would not buy a Holden Colorado over a Ford Ranger
OssieLad64 4 months ago
@Blitzwolf44 oooh. thanks dude.
kaparl95 4 months ago
@kaparl95 colorad, bt50 and ranger are the same truck with a different badge
Blitzwolf44 4 months ago
Looks like a ford ranger wildtrak 2012
kaparl95 5 months ago