Omega Speedmaster Professional Sapphire Sandwich
Uploader Comments (breitlingsource)
Top Comments
-
@londonbill100 Very typical time gain for a mechnical watch, and generally considered quite acceptable for a mechanical watch too. If accuracy and reliability are your main concern, stick with your quartz.
All Comments (55)
-
londonbill100 you have no soul why are you even looking at watch videos
-
@londonbill100 lol a watch is jewelry to alot of man, many times the only piece they cary. If watches arent your thing then why watch this video if you dont like them thats a better question.
-
That's not the moonwatch, there is only one moonwatch, and that's all :)
-
there is no co-axial in this ...
-
I own this watch & I love it :)
-
Hi, what size is your clasp?
-
@londonbill100 Because you can and you want to. If your happy with a Casio that's your choice but as an engineer I appreciate the mechanical movement as I also appreciate a far from perfect hand built car. A factory robot built Audi will never be as desirable as a hand built 60's Aston but its a heap more reliable just as your Casio keeps better time than the Omega. Imperfection is one of it's idiosyncrasies. By the way I also own a robot built Audi and love it but would love the Aston more.
Omega was not the only watch worn on the moon. In 1971 David Scott's Speedmaster lost its plexiglass crystal so he wore a Waltham. This was during Apollo 15. Just saying.....
atcpd111 3 months ago
@atcpd111 And also another astronaut snuck another watch on the moon as well... doesn't really matter to me either way. Its what it says on the back of the watch.
breitlingsource 3 months ago
ADHD? You move this watch around more than a crack squirrel twitches....
TellMeRUABadFish2 4 months ago 3
@TellMeRUABadFish2 Actually, I'm a crack squirrel.
breitlingsource 4 months ago 2
CAN YOU HOLD THE WATCH STILL FOR JUST 5 SEC PLEASE?
2000wb 4 months ago 3
@2000wb Sure. Just did! ;)
breitlingsource 4 months ago 7