Trian's Antigravity Lifter Experiment
Top Comments
All Comments (736)
-
@Beamshipcaptain ion winds hate ground. aluminum foil have nothing to do with capacitance. the electric force is stronger than all other known forces. for electric flux ground means currents and currents means bad lifting force. currents is needed for charge separation but not for lift. a electric flux is electric force times distance and is work like mechanical work.. positive and negative charge is basically a difference in force between quantities of negative charges.
-
@coldarc Ion wind is a feeble force of at least three orders of magnitude too weak to cause levitation of a 5 gram model, and we have flown models hundreds of grams! google: FORCE ON AN ASYMMETRIC CAPACITOR.
-
@Beamshipcaptain Beamie... you claim to be in charge of the development of the SEG and IGV. Magaging a research team is a full time responsibility. Kurisu is right in that there is no possible way that you could be managing a legitimate research team AND playing in your band AND running your online buisness AND still have time to buy, play with, and film all of those RC planes of yours.
-
@kurisu925 It IS my primary focus. But we all have to work to support our research. Advertising a business is the way to put a business on a paying basis. Logic.
-
lifters are ion wind devices. they use the same principle as the aurora turbulence for motion. they are electrostatic flying machines that use pulsating electric field. the electric field in the air and the lifter itself attract each other. anti-gravity is something completely different. gravity is a dynamic field were the electric and magnetic field move parallel to the gravitational field. gravity is anti-gravity inside another gravitational field. gravity manifest trapped energy as field.
-
@doceigen Yea... you would think they would be able to take a hint from the fact that the original inventor named it an "Ionocraft". All this antigravity bull shit came later and has only been promoted by conmen in the entire history of the technology.
-
We all know these beam lifters are based on the ionic movement of air to gain lift. I made an ionocraft in 1971, it floated too, pretty nice actually, in a calm closed room. These are a better design, more elegant, but... they are NOT anti-gravity!
-
@Beamshipcaptain Ok so now you claim to work on both lifters and the SEG full time. That is 8 hours a day. sleep should take up another 8 hours so when exactly do you find the time to practice in your band, manage your online buisness that sells lifter kits, and play with all of those remote control planes you keep filming and mosting videos of... Funny you have the time to post videos of remote control planes but fail to post videos of any of the 41 IGVs before losing them... Be logical beamie.
@Beamshipcaptain There is no work being done. You play in a band and you run an online buisness that sells lifter kits. Between the two there is no way you have the time to be involved in the lifter research and the SEG research with John Searl as you claim. A REAL researcher would make such work his primary focus if it could do the things you claim these do. We can clearly see what your primary focus is. Most of your videos are of your band and you advertize your buisness all the time.
kurisu925 8 months ago 13
@Beamshipcaptain Ofcourse you lack any video of the flight footage I challenged you to post 14 months ago. Or any other evidence of actual research. Though you do show yourself playing with some of the lifter kits. Not performing any tests with them though.
kurisu925 8 months ago 9