Markets! Finance! Scandal! (E69)

This time Max Keiser and co-host, Stacy Herbert, look at the scandals of swindled nuns, bounty hunters for small time fraud and Irish banks in a 'league of their own.' In the second half of the show, Max talks to economist, Shir Hever of the Alternative Information Center, about the Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions movement and about the economics of occupation.

Category:

• News

Tags:

• RT
• Max Keiser
• Goldman Sachs J.P. Morgan
• IMF
• David Cameron
• economy
• finance
• GDP
• bankers
• Keiser
• Keiser RT
• Kaiser report
• maxkeiser.com
• Euro
• dollar
• currency
• security
• inflation
• deficit
• budget
• insurance
• job loss
• Wall Street
• stock markets report
• world financial crisis news
• US foreign debt
• great depression

[mudbonesmoke]

there's something about Stacy ;)

[TheObserver2012]

@magbast9 Do you have any evidence of that? If so put up or shut up!

[magbast9]

Max is a mouth piece for the KGB and Putin

[itsanameisntit]

Anyone who is familiar with American history, particularly what happened to the frontiersman, will understand exactly what's happening in Israel today. Before the Second World War, England was absolutely adamant that Jews could not be given as state in Palestine. After world war two, went in and could no longer afford a standing armies there, they opened up the door to Jews, as a boot in the door to the Arab world, and thereby Arab Oil.

[sanarkhos]

@dontblockmedk

It has everything to do with socialism. Your abundance argument is older than Marxism, and has been put to rest eons ago by Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk.

Your questions are completely irrelevant, and as I said before what we have today isn't "money for labor" so to call something that doesn't exist as obsolete is nonsense.

I 'get' your argument just like Böhm-Bawerk got it over a century ago. Nothing new here

[dontblockmedk]

@s This has NOTHING AT ALL to do with socialism so your implication only makes you look stupid. The REAL questions.

1 Can we produce abundant food, water, energy, etc for everyone or not?

2 Do we have the technology to automate most of the work or not?

If no, prove it.

If yes, 'money for labor' is OBSOLETE. So the only logical system is to produce abundance and just distribute it. There can only be force when there is NOT enough for everyone, ONLY with abundance EVERYONE is FREE. GET IT.

[sanarkhos]

@dontblockmedk

It was never a money for labour system. It is I'll trade my surplus for yours.

Your socialist utopian BS isn't a new idea and fails on the same demerits.

[sanarkhos]

@TheBlitz1

It's harmless considering most people are too busy demonizing or deifying political parties like Democrats and Republicans.

If and when a revolt does happen the crooks will just lead them in circles like they always do.

[sanarkhos]

@jimmycrackedcorn225

Monopolies are inefficient and wouldn't exist if not for political support. The absolute limit to how far a firm can monopolize a market is limited by the existence of real prices, which cannot exist if there is only one provider. This is explained rather well in the book Man, Economy, and State which even made the valid comparison of the Soviet Union as a massive vertically integrated company.