Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
A better question would be: If they faked it, why would they not put in "booster exhaust?" Hollywood movies of space ships had been made with "booster exhaust" for at least 30 years by then.
If they were gonna fake it, they surely would have remembered to put in the exhaust!!
You don't see any exhaust because it was not visible. Why would it be visible? It's only lifting about 2000 pounds. Probly less than 5PSI pressure out the nozzle.
The camera was mounted on the lunar rover and, for this shot, was controlled by remote control back in Houston. There is a several second delay in communication to the moon because it's so far away so the first couple times they tried this on other landings the timing was off and they didn't get a very good shot of the liftoff. This was the only one where they panned with the right timing to get a good picture.
really? sounds like a fib. it means they should be able to do that today then.
send a hi-res camera up on a probe and operate it from Houston? must call bullshit on this because...again they fail to do 40 years later...what they did in 1969.
It cost about 10 times as much as NASA's current budget. Why would they want to do it again? They've already been there.
The argument that they "can't do it today" is blatantly silly. Of course we could do it again. And we probably will ... some time. But to continue to spend that money all the time just ain't gonna happen.
The evidence of a hoax is crushing. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. To see it, google "The Naked Scientist". In the "New Theories" section there's a thread entitled "Did we land on the moon?". The post is on page 15. It's the 7th one from the top.
How did they link up with the "mother ship" (the Apollo command module) ...
Both ships have docking ports. They went into lunar orbit and connected the two ships together. Then they left the lander behind and came home in the command module.
They practiced docking in space as early as some of the Gemini orbiter missions several years earlier.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
It's really simple. In order for there to be a flame oxygen must be present. There is no oxygen in space.
A better question would be: If they faked it, why would they not put in "booster exhaust?" Hollywood movies of space ships had been made with "booster exhaust" for at least 30 years by then.
If they were gonna fake it, they surely would have remembered to put in the exhaust!!
You don't see any exhaust because it was not visible. Why would it be visible? It's only lifting about 2000 pounds. Probly less than 5PSI pressure out the nozzle.
really?
sounds like a fib.
it means they should be able to do that today then.
send a hi-res camera up on a probe and operate it from Houston?
must call bullshit on this because...again they fail to do 40 years later...what they did in 1969.
namaste
Do you have any clue how much this all cost?
It cost about 10 times as much as NASA's current budget. Why would they want to do it again? They've already been there.
The argument that they "can't do it today" is blatantly silly. Of course we could do it again. And we probably will ... some time. But to continue to spend that money all the time just ain't gonna happen.
Both ships have docking ports. They went into lunar orbit and connected the two ships together. Then they left the lander behind and came home in the command module.
They practiced docking in space as early as some of the Gemini orbiter missions several years earlier.