Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Apollo 17 Lunar Liftoff

As photographed from camera mounted on the lunar rover, and from inside the crew cabin in lunar module.  
 
Customize

More From: colty77

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
14 ratings
Sign in to rate
22,565 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (91)   Options

Loading...
enm97 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"How come there is no booster exhaust"?

It's really simple. In order for there to be a flame oxygen must be present. There is no oxygen in space.
nesokretep (3 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
"How come there is no booster exhaust"?

A better question would be: If they faked it, why would they not put in "booster exhaust?" Hollywood movies of space ships had been made with "booster exhaust" for at least 30 years by then.

If they were gonna fake it, they surely would have remembered to put in the exhaust!!

You don't see any exhaust because it was not visible. Why would it be visible? It's only lifting about 2000 pounds. Probly less than 5PSI pressure out the nozzle.
UNTC321 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
who was filming the takeoff
nesokretep (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The camera was mounted on the lunar rover and, for this shot, was controlled by remote control back in Houston. There is a several second delay in communication to the moon because it's so far away so the first couple times they tried this on other landings the timing was off and they didn't get a very good shot of the liftoff. This was the only one where they panned with the right timing to get a good picture.
islandbuoy4 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
a fella in Houston was operating the joystick?

really?
sounds like a fib.
it means they should be able to do that today then.

send a hi-res camera up on a probe and operate it from Houston?
must call bullshit on this because...again they fail to do 40 years later...what they did in 1969.

namaste
nesokretep (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"How come they don't do it again today?"

Do you have any clue how much this all cost?

It cost about 10 times as much as NASA's current budget. Why would they want to do it again? They've already been there.

The argument that they "can't do it today" is blatantly silly. Of course we could do it again. And we probably will ... some time. But to continue to spend that money all the time just ain't gonna happen.
MaldonadoMadness (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
its a robotic camera that was left there watch when we left earth and it tells about it
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
vladika07 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
how did they link up with the mother ship?
nesokretep (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
How did they link up with the "mother ship" (the Apollo command module) ...

Both ships have docking ports. They went into lunar orbit and connected the two ships together. Then they left the lander behind and came home in the command module.

They practiced docking in space as early as some of the Gemini orbiter missions several years earlier.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.