Wilkerson on his collaboration on WMD presentation at UN

Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State Colin Powell, on his collaboration on the 'weapons of mass destruction in Iraq' presentation at the UN. Watch the entire episode (50") on the VPRObacklight website: http://www.vpro.nl/programma/tegenlic...

• Category

  News & Politics

[makkertje]

LIES, LIARS, PROPAGANDA, DECEITS!! How come these criminals are still free?? They have the blood of hundreds of thousands people on their hands!!

[Jadranko Brkic]

this is absolutely shocking, why the neocon's aren't being prosecuted?

[Jetztwirdsluschdig]

Curved ball listen to curved ball. CIA

[Jetztwirdsluschdig]

This lie, was the same thing as they did back in 1917 Lusitania! USA you are so rotten!

[Juvias Caen]

You can see it on everyones face are they going to belive this lie ,what will happen if we get caught.

[WilhelmDrake]

Even if everything in Mr. Powell's speech was true, it still does not make a legal case for war.

The same goes with the invasion of Afghanistan, even if every one of their stated reasons for war were true, they still did/ do not make a legal case for war.

If harbouring terrorists is a legitimate cause for war, then it would be legal for Cuba to invade the US, something nobody believes to be the case.

[Kay Mske]

Spread this message .....

Bank of America . ...JP Morgan .Chase Bank ... Wells Fargo.. Citi Bank......

Customers Close your Accounts ....

Join a Small Community banks and credit unions ....

[GSNPFL]

just what bush/cheney needed to convince american people to go to war with Iraq.

they couldn't do it w/o colin powell who people BELIEVED.

only one thing wrong -- powell was lying......... after which he resigned.

[SaveUSyay]

On foreign policy they are both basically idential. On soical policy these are almost identical as well. Both of these candidtes oppose goverment bailout for corporations. Both of them are for the people's interest, not corporations.  They do have fudemental differences in their fasical policy. I am more towards Ralph Nadar's, but i sure would not mind trying Dr Ron Paul's Libertarian policy. I think that US will be way better of with either of them.

[ikillhippies]

why do you support two people who believe in almost completely opposite things, i don't think there are two potential presidential runners who have more opposing viewpoints.