Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Wilkerson on his collaboration on WMD presentation at UN

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
12,516
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 2, 2007

Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State Colin Powell, on his collaboration on the 'weapons of mass destruction in Iraq' presentation at the UN. Watch the entire episode (50") on the VPRObacklight website: http://www.vpro.nl/programma/tegenlicht/afleveringen/34338524/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • LIES, LIARS, PROPAGANDA, DECEITS!! How come these criminals are still free?? They have the blood of hundreds of thousands people on their hands!!

  • this is absolutely shocking, why the neocon's aren't being prosecuted?

see all

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Even if everything in Mr. Powell's speech was true, it still does not make a legal case for war.

    The same goes with the invasion of Afghanistan, even if every one of their stated reasons for war were true, they still did/ do not make a legal case for war.

    If harbouring terrorists is a legitimate cause for war, then it would be legal for Cuba to invade the US, something nobody believes to be the case.

  • Spread this message .....

    Bank of America . ...JP Morgan .Chase Bank ... Wells Fargo.. Citi Bank......

    Customers Close your Accounts ....

    Join a Small Community banks and credit unions ....

  • just what bush/cheney needed to convince american people to go to war with Iraq.

    they couldn't do it w/o colin powell who people BELIEVED.

    only one thing wrong -- powell was lying......... after which he resigned.

  • On foreign policy they are both basically idential. On soical policy these are almost identical as well. Both of these candidtes oppose goverment bailout for corporations. Both of them are for the people's interest, not corporations. They do have fudemental differences in their fasical policy. I am more towards Ralph Nadar's, but i sure would not mind trying Dr Ron Paul's Libertarian policy. I think that US will be way better of with either of them.

  • @SaveUSyay why do you support two people who believe in almost completely opposite things, i don't think there are two potential presidential runners who have more opposing viewpoints.

  • lies lies lies les. what a bs propaghada. fuck democraps and republicunts. ralph nadar and ron paul for 2012.

  • LIES LIES LIES LIES. wHAT A BS PROPRAGHANDA. FUCK DEMOCRAPS AND REBULICUNTS. RON PAUL & RALPH NADAR 2012 CANIDITES.

  • Bush & Cheney used C. Powell to get their war, just like they used all the soldiers who were sent to fight the war of the Neo-Cons!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more