Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

F7U CUTLASS LAUNCHING USS INTREPID

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
30,523
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 5, 2008

This is the F7U Cutlass launching from USS Intrepid (CVA-11) in 1956.

I am avid collector and restorer of Naval Aviation films, especially 8mm home movies. See some of my collection at www.cv41.org/GRS

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Better engines & slats would have improved the cutlass. as would a better designed nose gear.

  • The engines were not only underpowered, but were also slow to respond to throttle commands. a common problem with early Jet engines.

  • @Vermiliontea Correct... the westinghouse engines were the big problem, they just could not get the required thurst. it was common that the pilot had to hit afterburnner in the pattern just to keep it from falling out of the sky. It was said that Westinghouse toasters could produce more heat than their jet engines. Vaught was never known fro their landing gear designs, they were always complicated, and weak.

  • fugg ze USA!

  • The way I remember it, I'm fairly certain the engines were the overwhelming cause for accidents and the relevant reason the F7U failed.

  • the f-7u is cool looking and is a hot ship but has a bad design in its wings

  • @Canashea Actually, the F7U suffered a much higher accident rate than other naval jets of this time due to the wing design and the terribly underpowered angines fitted to the airframe. The Cutlass was a known "sinker" on approach and many a Cutlass ended its tenure and the life of its pilot on the round down. In flight the Cutlass was a well behaved and a pilots aircraft. On approach she became a malicious bitch with fangs waiting for an inattentive pilot to get behind.

  • That's exactly right according to my dad.

    He flew he A7 Corsair II off a carrier back in the early 70s.

    The undercarriage of the Cutlass was under-designed for an aircraft of this weight and stated mission.

    All carrier landings are "controlled crashes".

    I'm glad dad didn't have to fly the Cutlass.

    Mom was already a basket case at it was with him flying a Corsair II.

  • The F-7 Cutlass is a good plane and its layout still would be today. Its just the very long nose landing gear what caused the crashes.

  • I heard somebody was restoring one to fly again...That was more than ten years ago.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more