CNN: The Politics of Planting

Why did so many of the questioners in the Nov 15 Democrat debate turn out to be activists of one kind or another?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• cnn
• politics
• democrat
• debate
• nevada
• obama
• clinton
• blitzer
• planting
• questions

[TylerNull]

Democrats, Deception & Fraud -- Life Partners

[RenShiWu]

Thank you Michelle Malkin.

[whoostino]

@TylerNull

At least I'm writing on a page no one is using anymore. You seem to prefer ejaculating off-topic novellas in forums where you're sure to be ignored by 99% of the readers.

[TylerNull]

@whoostino

Your 5 post novella fails to hide the exposed fraud.

Try blathering for 10 posts next time.

[whoostino]

@TylerNull

"control the questions?" CNN's attempt to control questions had nothing to do with the affiliations of these people in their private life.

And there is no reason any undecided voter should be excluded from asking questions of candidates in primary debates. Unless there is a clear conflict of interest, there is no reason CNN needs to identify them as "activists". If they choose not to be identified as such its actually kind of invasive.

[TylerNull]

@whoostino

If your mind wasn't so easily led, this would be glaringly obvious to you that the purpose of the deception is to control the questions.

There is no shortage of registered Democrats -- "undecided voters" -- who are NOT Democrat party activists, who would like the opportunity ask a REAL question, like why Obama believes we can be taxed into prosperity or borrow our way out of debt.

But don't let the exposed Democrat deception stop you from trying to defend it.

[whoostino]

@TylerNull

They were identified as "undecided Democrats". It is unimportant that a woman is identified as a culinary union member when she is asking a question about social security. Or that the chick who asked "diamonds or pearls" once interned for Harry Reid. That's a BS rule made up by you and Michelle Malkin.

You would not propose this crap for Tea Party activists (who are also just ordinary citizens). The only story here is that you don't like Democrats. Big whoop.

[TylerNull]

@whoostino

The plain fact, clearly exposed in the video, remains that CNN colluded with Dem'rat candidates to HIDE THE FACT that DEMOCRAT PARTY ACTIVISTS were the ones asking the questions; NOT merely "undecided voters"; NOT merely you average Dem'rat citizen; NOT merely a politically unconnected voter, as the viewers were led to believe.

That is a purposeful FRAUD and DECEPTION.

And you're not dumb enough to not know all this, so stop publicly debasing yourself in defense of Democrat scum.

[whoostino]

@whoostino

You and Malkin actually bring conservatives down when you try to portray this as media bias. The only controversy was when CNN handed the “diamonds & pearls” question to the one girl, who had a tougher question to ask. That was for their own sensationalist purposes, not because Clinton couldn’t handle a question on nuclear policy.

[whoostino]

@TylerNull

What makes you think this debate was open to the public? This was a November 2007 primary debate. At the beginning Blitzer says, “In the second part, we will hear directly from some of this group of about 100 undecided Nevada DEMOCRATS”

[whoostino]

@TylerNull

Why would the speakers use their real names if this was a conspiracy? Why would their organizations send top level officials instead of 20 year-old interns to ask a memorized question? Seriously man, apply some critical thinking.

[whoostino]

@TylerNull

“However, they are Democrat party activists, and that salient point was hidden from the public."

If it was such a big secret, why did Obama give a shoutout from the stage to the culinary worker lady?? That you read conspiracy stuff into this is insane. Activists don't need to hide their agenda in a primary debate. Quite the opposite. Would Tea Party activists hide theirs in a GOP debate? It defeats their purpose! Malkin just thinks this is all secret because she's a lousy reporter.