Deepak Chopra answers a question.
Top Comments
All Comments (154)
-
Poor old Deepak. Just not really up to game he started. Fucking idiot.
-
I love Deepak
-
Deepak is like ..."hmmm.. what ?.... PLease Come again"
-
MAXIMUM PWNAGE in minimum words..... ROTFL !
-
Fucken BUZZINGA Deepak
-
Zing!
-
Bitch in the purple will have none of that. She's probably gonna get graped anyways.
-
@mitch7788 Mitch the bitch. The absurdist is not guided by morality, but rather, by his or her own integrity. The absurdist is, in fact, amoral (though not necessarily immoral). Morality implies an unwavering sense of definite right and wrong at all times, while integrity implies honesty with the self and consistency in the motivations of one's actions and decisions.
-
the guy at 0:27 looks like my dumb ass old boss
-
More verbal inanity from DeepCrap Chokeya.
Deepak Chopra, mentor to the delusional, PRETENDS to be the guru of spirituality, peace, and love. However the article has very little love and certainly no peace. Actually, it seems to blatantly contradict all that Chopra allegedly stands for.
Somehow presuming bad acts from a person doesn't seem to be very enlightened does it?
But ole DeepCrap goes well beyond bad into absurdest notions.
OMG. Best. Comeback. Ever. I don't know the discussion or even who I'd agree with, but this man made his point like a BOSS.
verminjerky 11 months ago 12
@yt345 No, the phrasing was very clear and straighforward. For a person to know something as fact yet not believe it as fact is irrational. If we assume Deepak to be a rational person, we assume that he believes what he knows. Deepak "knows" that all belief is a coverup for insecurity. If we assume Deepak to be a rational person, then he must also believe such. Deepak does believe such and, in fact, holds it as his belief. Thus, Deepak is covering-up his insecurity.
powerhousejp 11 months ago 6