Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Don't Vote Stupid: Who's American?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,215
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 17, 2008

Don't Vote Stupid #1
http://www.britethorn.com
Written and Directed by John T. Kramer. Voices by Chip Bradley and John T. Kramer.
Music by Ryan Miera.

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (117)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @dalmatian847 Look, fact of the matter is, there is no logical debate here. True debate leads to resolution (if only point-by-point). You just want affirmation - that's an utter waste of my time (and yours). So here's your affirmation:

    I agree, Obama is bad. Liberals are bad. Conservatives are good. Guns, god, and guts. All that jazz... Impeach Obama. Ron Paul 2012.

  • @dalmatian847 TL; DR. Blind speculation, quote-mining, misreading/misinterpreting posts, plethoras of strawman arguments, negating to acknowledge definitions of words... the list goes on! It would literally take me a few days to read through, point out, and address your wall-of-text ramblings -- let alone present it in a manner that was immune to your ~unique~ interpretation.

    ...I never even qouted you saying the words "underemployed" or "impoverished."

  • @TheRealCadaver WTF are you talking about? Where have I ever used the term "underemployed" or "impoverished" ??? I have used NEITHER words in any of my posts, but your imagination seen to think otherwise-which is very telling.

    Why is making a generalization that can at least be backed up by FACT somehow not as relevant as you generalizing millions of Americans have been unemployed for the last two years as entirely their fault? What nonsense! So it is different how? Because you say so?

  • @TheRealCadaver Again, what part of context do you not understand? Poverty in the U.S is defined by the amount of money you make and the amount of individuals in the family. It has NOTHING to do with lack of belongings. By that defintion, the people in poverty has INCREASED in the two years of Obama, the highest it's been since under Clinton in 1995. Are you suffering from a brain injury? I'm glad you have the internet, perhaps you should learn to use it in an intelligent manner.

  • @TheRealCadaver Right and "under his watch" NAFTA was signed. How many jobs were "outsourced" there. China was granted Most Favored Trading status PERMANENTLY. How'd that work out for the U.S worker? The CRA was enhanced, leading to the housing bubble and the Glass-Steagall Act was repealed, leading the the Wallstreet meltdown.

    But, hey. I guess if those "factually absent"  events that occured under Clinton's "watch" makes me woefully uninformed, what does not knowing these make you then?

  • @TheRealCadaver Funny how we starteed losing those jobs AFTER Obama was elected. I guess companies saw the writing on the wall, didn't they? That's how they stay in business, by actually taking Obama at his word. Now what derugulation of banking and lender practces was passed under Bush? The last major pieces of deregulayion were passed under Clinton. What POTUS granted China most favored nation status and signed NAFTA into law? Yeah I keep coming back to Clinton because I know history.

  • @TheRealCadaver Once again, your choice to play a semantics game demonstrates how weak your argument is. Why don't you address your grievances on how the word "poverty" is used in an op-ed piece to the N.Y, Times aka "the newspaper of record" as it was THEIR use of the word poverty which I qouted verbatim. So one more time, where did all those poverty sticken people come from? Did we import them especially for the Obama administration? How does the poverty level increase under Obama?

  • @TheRealCadaver Except none of those apply to modern liberalism any more so than communist E. Germany was the "Democratic Republic of Germany" or North Korea is the "Democratic Republic of N. Korea"

    Classical defintions of liberalism do not apply to the political defintion of liberalism within American Society. That being a need to fundamentally change the founding principles of the U.S Constitution any more than "Democratic" applies to the official names of two communist states I mentioned.

  • @TheRealCadaver I'm sorry I guess I must have missed the racist remarks that conservatives have put on here, Can you point those out for me?

    For starters, what makes some a "liberal" has nothing to do with racism, If that was the case Sen Robert Byrd, former KKK grand dragon would not have been the longest serving "liberal" in the Senate.

    What seperates American "liberals" from "conservatives" is how one views the U.S Constitution. That I learned 25 years back in Poli Sci 101. Get educated.

  • @dalmatian847 And what, is calling someone a liberal supposed to be some kind of insult? Really? Hahahahahaha. Hmm, let's see what that means...

    Liberal -

    a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

    b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

    c. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.

    Shit, that's horrible.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more