The Real Cost of Climate Change
Top Comments
All Comments (69)
-
we have to be aware of this thing
-
How many schoolchildren got blown up in the name of the global warming hoax?
31,000 scientists say that AGW is a lie!
-
My interest was at first casual
But in recent months I've spent some time actually chasing down the papers... it's honed me, making me totally convinced of the reality of AGW
We will be taxed by carbon one way or another
Economists are saying it's cheaper to pay a tax up front than deal with loss of crops, land and water resources which may lead to famine wars and political upheaval
It is true that the old (oil) guard will still manage to float to the top
It's in our interests to change now
-
these guys always talk about carbon taxes and very often talk about vaccinations too. when they start talking about vaccinations you know you're dealing with an incredibly paranoid person.
the great climate swindle has been thoroughly picked apart by REAL experts, holding no evidence against man-made global warming. it's funny how desperate this guy is to bring up social science papers and movies like "the great climate swindle"
-
Your ad hominems are wasted on me, you sent me a video previously, another video by the same author confirmed the tiny amount of agw due to Co2, you must only watch the selective bits that suit you. LOL. You contradict your own evidence. I'm done with you, so go pay your carbon tax and get your kiddies their shots. Unless your still single which is a distinct possibility.
-
"Co2 does not lead temperature, rather it is the other way round"
Strawman!!!
watch?v=hWJeqgG3Tl8&feature=ch
annel -
Oh on the great climate swindle... it's a great resource
watch?v=boj9ccV9htk&feature=ch
annel the swindle is a 'swindle'
-
He is into political science,
the peer reviewed paper he sites?
"This article appeared in Science as Culture 8:4 (1999), 437-472"
Science as Culture?
ooooh!
Hence he mixes up IPCC a political body (to state the obvious) with the noble scientific research institutions noted above
The paper is a tepid attempt of irrelevant sociologists to insert themselves into the discussion... it's like "I need some attention too!"
mixing the science and politics and coming up with a truly warped waste product
-
oh bacon is soooo much smarter than well respected experts on climate change haha.
but seriously, if he expects us to listen to his bullshit be better get a PhD and do some hard-hitting research. has he said a thing that hasn't come out of glenn beck's mouth?
-
Wrong again
Strip away the IPCC you have WMO, NOAA, USGS, BOM, NASA, NAS's of 35 industrialized nations, CSIRO, USGS, UNFCCC, WCRP, USCRN, CFCAS, WHOI, TERI, NICCR, CCRI, CIC... it goes on and on
Look, your not even trying
BTW, One of my favorite insults is 'bong shaped reality' but I figure I can't make that one stick to you eh?
Baconified is right, its all brainwashing and these people who say otherwise dont have the first clue what they are talking about. IPCC 4th report has been shot to hell as has Gores lies. 56% of Americans have woen up to the bull, are they all wrong too. What a joke.
jonforris 2 years ago 6
Go Baconified, if you think agw is real and you have followed the debate as you say since the 80s then you must know what you are talking about. Enjoy paying your carbon tax so. Problem solved, our leaders will solve it right. You sit on your pedastal and wax lyrical about your illuminated perspective. The sun, the oceans and volcanoes created the holocene maximum. Correct? How much GH gas do the oceans create? How many gigatons do we create? You know the answer. FA. As you say.
Laughable
INFORMEDIRISH 2 years ago 4