Skepticism, Pessimism and the Burden of Proof
Loading...
Loading...
7:30
Misc 02: Why does God require faith?by robvandjdk85 views- 3:29
Pastor Bill Dollar panics over the end times coming soon...by zoroasterman150 views
- 8:35
Understanding the Old Testament #3: The Incomparable Jesus Christby robvandjdk80 views
- 8:22
A Case for Christianity Video #5: Summaryby robvandjdk34 views
- 9:27
A Case for Christianity Video #3: From Deism to Theismby robvandjdk91 views
- 7:36
Understanding the Old Testament #1: Introduction and Overviewby robvandjdk185 views
- 9:39
Understanding the Old Testament #14: Summaryby robvandjdk216 views
- 9:01
Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and Free Will Part 2by robvandjdk181 views
- 27:02
You Have No Idea How Wrong You Areby SisyphusRedeemed62,476 views
- 3:21
Christian Bale calls Miguel Pradoby Pessimism2,139 views
- 10:01
J P Moreland : Skepticism and Epistemology 6 of 8 Apologeticsby grandconjunct2,046 views
- 9:50
Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and Free Will Part 1by robvandjdk585 views
- 9:44
Miscellaneous #8: Why do you love Jesus Christ?by robvandjdk49 views
- 8:38
A Case for Christianity Video #4: From Theism to Christianityby robvandjdk52 views
- 8:40
Miscellaneous 06: Why does Gandhi go to hell while Christians go to heaven?by robvandjdk708 views
- 8:29
Heaven and Hell #1: The Problem of Hellby robvandjdk333 views
- 8:39
Misc 03: Is the cross barbaric?by robvandjdk29 views
- 8:04
Response to Putting Faith in its Placeby robvandjdk1,280 views
- 8:39
Against the Atheists: Hitchens #1 Part 2by robvandjdk154 views
- 7:55
Against the Atheists: Hitchens #1 Part 1by robvandjdk407 views
@pochopaz7381 It is by then not a pessimistic claim is nothing more than a logical conclusion
pochopaz7381 8 months ago
But there is also the optimistic that because it hasnt been completely proven false it is instantly true, you need an evidence for a positive and a negative claim, yet there are reasons to believe that there isnt a god
pochopaz7381 8 months ago
There IS a preponderance of evidence pointing towards the US being a representative democracy. This is why your analogy fails because there is no preponderance of evidence for Christianity. What you're doing is saying that because we can't prove a negative (that Christianity is false), it is reasonable to establish any arbitrary burden of proof. That's demonstrably wrong. Am I justified in believing in unicorns because my personal burden of proof is that they at least have to be drawn somewhere?
sansdeus 9 months ago