Browns Gas

How to Make Any Car Run on Water:
http://Loan-er.com/water

Lots of people are interested in browns gas since the story started. An inventor named brown figured out how you can make any car run on 50% water (thus inventing browns gas) easily from under $40 worth of parts that you can get at any hardware store.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• browns
• gas
• fuel
• alternative
• gasoline
• save
• money

[BlameRepublicans]

SCAM ALERT.

[magselloff]

This is complete nonsense. This is just oxyhydrogen. Water was first electrically broken down into this "amazing new gas" in 1800. The energy required to generate the oxyhydrogen always exceeds the energy released by combusting it. It does not take much googling to see that the claims for HHo gas are outrageous.

[ausGeoff1]

@rarosera

Ahhh... the standard fallback of the grammar pedant when they're caught out making errors themselves.

"English is not my first language". Yeah, yeah, sure thing LOL.

May I suggest that if English is truly NOT your first language, then there's not really any point in your attempting to correct other native English speakers' written grammar?

[rarosera]

@ausGeoff1 Good point. I'm sure it'd strike deeper if english was my first language, which it is not, but thanks for pointing it out.

[ausGeoff1]

@rarosera

Hahahahaaaa... this is so funny!

Rarosera says "And learn about that little inverted comma thing called an APOSTROPHY It's used to show contraction, like when used to shorten 'you are,' to 'you're'.

This clown really lays into other folks for their poor grammatical skills, and then MISSPELLS "apostrophe" himself!

I'm still laughing.

Glass houses. Stones?

[Messo7]

It is worth it if it is produced using solar, hydro, and wind energy.

[Perter43]

Yes.. Browns gas is the oxygen hydrogen mix ..water broken back to the gases which produced it.

[rarosera]

@GregOrca 'That is all that is required?' No my moronic friend,, you also need that very 'unscientific' thing called IMAGINATION - The Wright bros used 'the scientific method' of trial and error with no peer review or theories to work from. In other words, NOT the scientific method that you speak of. But you are no scientist, you can't review carcinogens in sunscreens and have no analitical skills which require imagination. You are a self-glorified PUPPETEER - nothing more. Grow up!

[GregOrca]

@rarosera

No, you don't get it.

They used scientific method. That is all that is required.

Because you don't understand science you don't understand what they did.

The whole point of science is that anyone who uses scientific method can make major discoveries.

It has nothing to do with formal education ! That's why a humble untrained gardner made some of the most significant scientific discoveries in history. Do you even know who I'm referring to?

[rarosera]

@pspuria81 I think what you read was only part of a long discussion with someone poo-pooing Brown's Gas, where I was explaining how conventional education usually fails to yield real groundbreaking knowledge due to the vested interests in things remaining the way they are.

[pspuria81]

@rarosera apperently the way you commented gave me the impression that you didnt believe it being possible, perhaps rewording what you're trying to say might help get other people on the same view.

excuse the shorthand typing