Partition: The Day India Burned -4/9
Uploader Comments (KashifHKhan)
Top Comments
-
You are SO FULL OF IT. Sikhs never raped anyone? Look, i have many sikh friends, but this is so false. You are being emotional, and thinking that your people who follow your religion can do no wrong. In this very documentary, it is told how a muslim girl school in amritsar was raided and all the girls were stripped and raped. I have spoken to old sikh babaji's who themselves have told me that they knew men who raided and raped women and then cut their heads and breasts off.
-
The carnage was POINTLESS!!! Needless!! Frutiless!!!
All Comments (27)
-
Well , Documentary was one sided . For example , Its a reality that a train had reached Lahore from Shimla and all the Muslims in the train were butchered.
BUT YES I AGREE , Atrocities were committed on Both Sides.
-
i wish jinnah was alive! just so i could kill him again!
-
-
@ComradeJin Yea. He's right. See, the customs and traditions of older generations were really twisted. Honour and respect was placed above all else. So therefore, instead of risking "dishonour"(which is a pathetic way of putting it) which will be brought upon the family by raped women,they chose to kill those women before anyone of them was raped.. GOD IT MAKES ME MAD! STUPID RELIGION WAS THE REASON FOR ALL THIS!
-
It's sad that a woman's rape is considered her community and family's dishonour that she can avoid only by death. Men consider it their virility and honour to rape women or to kill them for honour.Partition was deliberately done, all plans were kept on hold till the last so that people killed and got killed. And it was obvious killing would happen -- land and livelihoods was involved. The British used the traditional distrust between Hindus and Muslims to crack open the sub-continent.
-
@KashifHKhan : One needs to read about domestic violence in all colonies at the time they are being vacated by colonial masters, will reveal a lot about the Imperialist culture. See Africa for instance. An optimistic thought is that an undivided India would have seen lessening communal tensions with Gandhi perhaps. And once India started recognizing national heroes in diverse fields, it would have been really progressive. The British created this Holocaust to avoid a backlash.
-
@nomani7 Yeah and what would you propose, Muslim and Sikhs ganging up to screw Hindus. The Hindus paid in blood in Bengal and the Sikhs suffered in Punjab and in both the events the honorable Muslims were the culprits. So please stuff your logic where it belongs, up your posterior hole...
-
I am a muslim from Lahore-Pakistan and I am in tears listening to this Sikh brother. It was not right.I am ashamed. Neither muslims nor sikhs should have done all this only to make the hindus better.
-
What was the Sikh gentleman saying at 8:00? He seems to be describing his own father killing his sister. WTF? Could somebody explain?
It's a really moving documentary. I learned a lot.
-
honor killing! do all Indian religions practice this matted?
PART 5:
Finally, I agree with one of the interviewers that Lahore has suffered tremendously as a result of Partition. Of course, I never witnessed his pre-Partition cosmopolitan, liberal, and progressive Lahore. But I have seen the decline of the city from mid-70s onwards due to Islamization. ("Islamization" is a direct consequence of Partition; it is a means to give people a new identity). In fact, the same can be said of Pak in general; Islamization is slowly but surely devouring it.
-Kashif
KashifHKhan 2 years ago
PART 4:
It may sound naive, I think a mechanism should have been instituted to allow those who wanted to stay behind in Punjab to be able to do so. I am an ethnic Punjabi from my father's side as well as a native of Lahore. My father - who witnessed Partition as a college student in Lahore and hails from a village in West Punjab - also told me that Partition was brutally enforced by local mobs. The best a neighbor could do was to help "other" community member escape to a refugee camp.
-Kashif
KashifHKhan 2 years ago
PART 3:
The suffering of women during the Partition is particularly deplorable. It is heart wrenching to hear tales of "honor killings" where fathers murdered their own daughters to prevent them from being "dishonored". Equally horrific are the instances of mass rapes of women by members of the "other" community. Finally, given a mother's natural love for her children, who would not be moved by decision of some of them to abandon infants during long march to other side of the border?
-Kashif
KashifHKhan 2 years ago
PART 2:
As Partition occurred on British watch, I believe it was their responsibility to ensure safety of people during expected migration. It is shocking that Mountbatten actually started returning British troops to the UK upon his arrival, did not utilize the Indian Army (under British command) to guarantee law and order, precipitated chaos by moving forward the date of Partition by one year, and invited additional killings by keeping the fate of Lahore a secret till last minute.
-Kashif
KashifHKhan 2 years ago
PART 1:
What can I say about Partition that has not already been said? It is the seminal event of the history of the Subcontinent as well as one of the defining moments of the 20th century. Still, I would like to make four observations: (a) the utter lack of preparation for mass migration; (b) the horrific treatment meted out to women; (c) the enforcement of Partition in Punjab against people's will; and (d) the decline of Lahore - and Pakistan in general - as a result of Partition.
-Kashif
KashifHKhan 2 years ago