The Golden Rule, Moral Relativism, Social Ethics, & Violent Reciprocity
Loading...
203
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (MysticPolitics)
see all
All Comments (5)
-
@MysticPolitics The honest to self key is to be able to determine the interaction of the conversation. So more or less before confrontation continues ask basic stand point questions. If they questions were already(in picture, etc) asked request if they requires a reiteration. If not, ignore. Non the less I feel you and much love. Also getting my way onto 'Cults, Conspiracies, & Secret Societies' as my first book on your list. :)
Loading...
Just let it go, they're not smart. Also using "facts" as an argument has and should of been disproved a LOOONNG time ago(depending on the "person"). I've found that if you're going to even bother, you need to get a understanding from them(sharing is caring). Then move into a counter questions(which forces thinking) versus to force thought(don't know if that's appropriate articulation). Never to just 'lay facts'. Much love sir! :D
P.S. I do feel for you when dealing with the flamers. :/
Nolen87 4 months ago
@Nolen87 I am not well suited for these flame-wars :(
MysticPolitics 4 months ago
Humans are rare contrary to our senses and experience, just saying. Don't beat your head against a wall they are zombies, mimics and gravity will correct the imbalance. Infinity for the infinite, inevitability for the infants.
WAX1138 4 months ago 2
@WAX1138 very true!
MysticPolitics 4 months ago