Tying up some loose ends with Labarum312

This is a response to some issues raised by Labarum312 in regards to my video, 'The Labarum'. In this video I discuss the FACTS about Westcott and Hort, and what is the essential issue in 'King James Onlyism'-
is the KJB only 'a' Bible or is it THE Bible.
Next to salvation itself, there is no more important decision for a believer to make.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• King James Bible
• King James Onlyism
• Westcott and Hort
• Riplinger

[JohnTheHutDweller]

So are the greek texts from the Antiochian Byzantines of the eastern orthodox communion still the bible? or did they stop being the bible after 1611? Every KJV onlyist I ever came across claims that the KJV is the bible and that no other translation into any other langauge not even the greek texts which the kjv translators used are the bible anymore, Do you agree with the statement that "The KJV is the only Bible for all the world even non english speakers"?

[edwardpf123]

@JohnTheHutDweller -The KJB is NOT the only Bible in the world for non-English speakers, it is the STANDARD for all other translations.

[JohnTheHutDweller]

@edwardpf123 then I have no contention with you

[edwardpf123]

@JohnTheHutDweller -glad to hear it!

I made a video explaining what I believe what is the position of most who believe the KJB is the perfect translation in English.

[XSC3]

the modern translations are not based upon Westcott & Hort. so even if these men were satanists (which they were not), that wouldn't matter a lick where modern english translations are concerned.

[edwardpf123]

@XSC3 -The Modern Translations are based on the same Critical text Manuscripts that Westcott and Hort used, that is why they are all corrupt. They all have gnostic readings.

[husky394xp]

"Conspiracy" appears 10 times, "Conspirators" appears once, and "Conspired" appears 19 times in the KJV. "COINCIDENCE" appears ZERO times in the KJV!

I like to ask the new versionists, "What would a Satanic counterfeit Bible look like?" If Satan designed one, would he openly announce to the world that it was a counterfeit? Or would he "conspire" through the seminaries and churches to slowly introduce the Christian church to his corrupt new versions?

[AnotherBroMark]

Great analogy on Christ not being just a great man any more than the King James Bible being a great bible.

Also, very perceptive on the strawmen being set up in favor of overlooking the true, irrefutable, historical facts about Wescott and Hort. It is all the Alexandrian mob has. Disregarding the truth in their face to focus on foolish sub-topical items of lesser interest and importance is a hallmark of their willful ignorance shining most brightly from the obstinate loud speakers of disinfo.

[edwardpf123]

@JohnTheHutDweller -There isn't a King James Onlyist who I have ever come into contact that would even say such a thing. Go to Riplingers and Ruckman's websites and see the Spanish Bible being sold there.

As for the Byzantine Greek texts, yes they are the pure Text type. But the KJB translators also used other sources, such as other language translations, the Old Latin, church fathers etc. So, not all the readings in the KJB are majority readings.

[edwardpf123]

@XSC3 -They refined the readings from pure texts, modern translations operate from corrupt texts.

' but to make a good one better or out of many good ones one PRINCIPAL good one, NOT JUSTLY TO BE EXCEPTED AGAINST hath been our endeavour, that our mark'

King James ONLYISM.

[edwardpf123]

@XSC3 -So? They put on marginal notes dealing with obscure Hebrew and Gr. words. They didn't put in marginal notes that questioned the text.

So, once again (for the last time) did they not say that their translation was to be the principal one or not?

[XSC3]

KJV translators admit updating & everyone does this: "But the difference that appeareth between our Translations, and our often correcting of them, is the thing that we are specially charged with; let us see therefore whether they themselves be without fault this way, (if it be to be counted a fault, to correct) and whether they be fit men to throw stones at us: O tandem maior parcas insane minori: they that are less sound themselves, out not to object infirmities to others." (preface)