Is there a scientific 'worldview'?
Loading...
Loading...
7:42
Debating Hitchensby PublicChristianity57,072 views- 9:56
The Great Debate: Lennox vs Shermer 1/10by PublicChristianity52,241 views
- 0:23
Expelled Movie Clip Exclusive - Michael Ruse Popular Theoryby getexpelled2,677 views
- 10:02
Michael Ruse interview mpeg4by artzmedia566 views
- 6:32
can Richard Dawkins prove atheism?by PublicChristianity4,202 views
- 5:25
truths.ca - A spiritual enema. (part 2 of 3) Human Evolution Missing Linkby TruthPurposeLife632 views
- 2:52
The New Atheists are Not Intellectually "Bright"by drcraigvideos128,428 views
- 1:42
Roger Scruton on the Scientific World viewby IamthePopeRome831 views
- 1:44:18
Can a Christian be a Darwinian?by exposedatheists317 views
- 1:13:46
Why Darwin Still Matters - Michael Ruseby pepperdine1,160 views
- 10:00
Discussion on reconciling evolution and religion 6-8by agentorange20785 views
- 7:53
Dr. Michael Ruse speaks at Huron University Collegeby HuronUC297 views
- 13:54
The Tower of Babelby BereanBeacon92,228 views
- 2:01:17
Is God Dead? Michael Tooley vs Peter Kreeftby exposedatheists5,936 views
- 10:00
Discussion on reconciling evolution and religion 1-8by agentorange202,773 views
- 7:28
Can Atheism / Atheists accept the fact that JESUS CHRIST IS REAL ???by VipChannel24,836 views
- 6:36
The Driscoll Storyby PublicChristianity16,630 views
- 4:34
A Line in the Sand - Michael Ruseby recycleyourfaith274 views
- 1:01:32
God and Biologyby exposedatheists346 views
- 0:42
Boris Johnson For Englandby jakemsf56,463 views
According to RowanEvans, it can if you use the right words. ;)
BassP86 1 year ago
Does not address the fact that evolution of the nose and the formation of the moon are not analogous to one another.
Mathenaut 1 year ago
Wrong. The 'idea' is not dogma. It doesn't become dogma unless it's blindly asserted and unquestioned like many of the claims of religion - which is really the big dividing line between the two.
Mathenaut 1 year ago
Oh they're not 'required' to be polar opposites. The problem is when religion makes baseless claims that conflict with the evidence demonstrated and supported by science.
Additionally, the cornerstone of modern science is peer-review, where ideas are run through the gauntlet of the entire community before being accepted in any real sense.
Religion does not have that kind of integrity.
Mathenaut 1 year ago
"it's just a matter of using the right words." - I don't think you realize the contradiction you've just made. That is precisely what philosophy deals with, the matter of word usage in propositions.
Let's not make the mistake of confusing truth with validity.
BassP86 2 years ago
Ultimately Rowan, your first premise is based on a half-truth. Science is is not against dogma in the sense that you are assuming. Rather science cannot test the idea of dogma, because it is not designed to do so. Therefore NEITHER a rejection NOR an acceptance of dogma is being made by the scientific method, if there is indeed no method that science uses to validate or invalidate it.
Therefore science and religion are NOT required to be polar opposites.
BassP86 2 years ago
The problem lies in your first premise. First you present a methodology to the table, which is science, but you place an IDEA into the equation, that idea is dogma. The next problem is that you are assigning the fallacy of equivocation, by first referring to dogma as a general concept, then presenting it by it's INDIVIDUAL claims. I strongly advise that you keep the meanings to your terms equal. (cont.)
BassP86 2 years ago
That isn't very specific...
Mathenaut 2 years ago
The leadership does present dogma, with people following; as a result of, ruling through fear.
brentpieczynski 2 years ago
Specifically?
Mathenaut 2 years ago