Obama Bombshell Audio Uncovered. He wants to Radically Reinterpret the Constitution to Redistribute Wealth!!
In a 2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview
Obama is discussing the best way to bring abou...
Obama Bombshell Audio Uncovered. He wants to Radically Reinterpret the Constitution to Redistribute Wealth!! In a 2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview Obama is discussing the best way to bring about a Redistribution of Wealth!!! This Video Exposes the radical underneath the rhetoric!!!
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
"Adults that are able-bodied made their own bed - they can lay in it."
Is someone who gets cancer and trips over a max limit a slacker? 10% of bankruptcies in this country are based on someone getting cancer, and over 90% of them started their cancer with full coverage.
In a free market, companies are about profit any way they can get it. Getting people that take more than they gave off the rolls is profitable. Denying coverage to risks is profitable.
@zzmook So far we've been giving those people free healthcare. It just sucks that a person with cancer has to go completely broke before they can get free healthcare. (paid for by taxpayers) But some jackasses around here think that's better than letting that person BUY a cheap public plan (paid for the person who buys it) that wouldn't drop them when they get cancer.
"gov't healthcare reform isn't about taking care of more people. it's about gov't control. "
...if you want to make a "big gov't" argument that's a better case. I don't think the whole "Democrats want a full communist state" or the old "they're trying to run the country into the ground on purpose" arguments really fly.
This is bigger government, yes. Idea is based on the argument that health care is a commodity that is better controlled outside of our version of free market capitalism.
I knew I shouldn't have wasted my breath. You are obviously young and ignorant. One of those true believers that thinks you can do absolutely nothing to reduce the price of healthcare, cover 30 million more people and somehow this won't cost anything.
I won't be responding any more...I just don't have the time or the energy to educate the useful idiots (read Marx) that support Obama.
@chrisogg Judging by your lack of knowledge of how the healthcare bill will be paid for, (YES, PAID FOR!) you are either a retard that can't understand what is being said on the news or you get all of your information from the local paranoid schizophrenic.
@dundeecatch22 Why do you say individuals will have to go with the public option? Private insurance companies offer individual policies. Don't you realize how many crap jobs there are that are not providing health insurance? How do you think those employees have been covering themselves? By selling off their assets so they can be poor and go on Medicare? They will have the option to stay with their current policy or they can switch to the evil, barbaric, monstrous, devilish, bloodthirsty, plan
@chrisogg Jeeze oh man. Who said you'd be paying for the people who BUY insurance through the government? The disabled and children will still get assistance but THE PUBLIC OPTION IS NOT FREE!!! WAKE UP! The trillion dollars of tax money over ten years is needed for the government to make the transition internally. It will only be paid for by those making over a quarter of a million dollars a year.
@chrisogg Once the ten years is up and the healthcare bill has been paid for, the program will sustain itself through the premiums it collects from its consumers. At a profit. Governmental Capitalism. Neat, huh? Buncha bullshit to me.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Is someone who gets cancer and trips over a max limit a slacker? 10% of bankruptcies in this country are based on someone getting cancer, and over 90% of them started their cancer with full coverage.
In a free market, companies are about profit any way they can get it. Getting people that take more than they gave off the rolls is profitable. Denying coverage to risks is profitable.
What should these people do?
...if you want to make a "big gov't" argument that's a better case. I don't think the whole "Democrats want a full communist state" or the old "they're trying to run the country into the ground on purpose" arguments really fly.
This is bigger government, yes. Idea is based on the argument that health care is a commodity that is better controlled outside of our version of free market capitalism.
I knew I shouldn't have wasted my breath. You are obviously young and ignorant. One of those true believers that thinks you can do absolutely nothing to reduce the price of healthcare, cover 30 million more people and somehow this won't cost anything.
I won't be responding any more...I just don't have the time or the energy to educate the useful idiots (read Marx) that support Obama.
I'll help the disabled and children. Adults that are able-bodied made their own bed - they can lay in it.