Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (440)
-
Wow what an old video. Good game but looks very dated, course it is. You can get it for 6.99 used at Gamestop. ha.
-
@WebVManReturns coolstorybrah
-
ps3......it only does everything *creepy*.................yea,i have no idea why i commented
-
The PS3 sucks fuckballs dipped in diarrhea and so does the 360. The Sega Genesis is where it's at.
-
this game will always be the super mario brothers for my ps3
-
@WebVManReturns kk
-
Sure PS3 and 360 are cool, but can you draw on their screens like with Vectrex? No.
-
PART 3 ?
-
I won't rage with you, but I'll say that I thought Halo 2 and Halo 3 were mediocre. I thought Halo 2's campaign had some good bits, but they were between lots of boring meh. The multiplayer I think is absolute rubbish. Halo 3 had a terrible, forgettable, boring campaign, but great multiplayer. Reach has a pretty good campaign (could have been better though), and awesome multiplayer. ODST was a good expansion, but was priced at full retail because Microsoft is full of greedy jerks.
-
@flrurry Not raging on you but I think Reach was great and yes ODST was some of the crappiest shit ever.
Of course it has great weapon everyone who played Ratchet and Clank on the PS2 know that insomniac makes the coolest weapons
thirstyforgame 11 months ago 51
This game is probably the freshest, grittiest FPS available on next generation consoles in my opinion. I liked it better than Halo 3 and Halo Reach, and found that the physics, weapons, and vehicles were excellently implemented and a lot of fun to use. Its also a lot longer than standard 360, PS3 FPS' clocking in at over 12-15 hours of single player length. The amount of enemies on screen is pretty impressive, especially when you consider the physics engine.
JPernam1983 10 months ago 13