Why did they resign? 4
Loading...
1,735
Loading...
Uploader Comments (brucewallace2)
see all
All Comments (15)
-
u make great interesting videos. keep it up!
-
the move was quiet obvious and there are not much variations that can be played so i would not consider this video interessting. Netherthenless i don't now why i even bother to comment it
-
that variant was shown in video. 2:56
-
oohhh nevermind the queen gets taken by the rook now i see it..
-
I am a idiot when it comes to chess but what would happend if the King takes the bishop??just educate me
-
good job, make some more!!
-
Beautiful example. Well explained.
Loading...
Bg1 is no desperado at all, it's a discovered attack.
schachgott 1 year ago
@schachgott I'm afraid your wrong. Bg1 is a desperado move. There is also a discovered attackas part of the move but a desperado nevertheless.
brucewallace2 1 year ago
As soon as you said "The Bishop can't move because the Rook is lost", I immediately saw Bg1! :-)
alexholowczak 3 years ago
Well spotted but Marco couldn't see it OTB and resigned.
brucewallace2 3 years ago
This famous game was played in Monte Carlo in 1902. However the position is incorrect. White's queen was on d3 already, his rook was on f1. White played 36. Rf1-d1 and Black - not seeing the winning Bd4-g1 - resigned.
Tophie1984 3 years ago
Thx I couldn't find the actual position and this does change things significantly.
brucewallace2 3 years ago