(see links below for details of this model, numerous peer reviewed publications, and direct observational evidence) The first thing that any person can see is that the current standard model of the...
(see links below for details of this model, numerous peer reviewed publications, and direct observational evidence) The first thing that any person can see is that the current standard model of the sun is highly inadequate. Its assumes that the top of the convection zone (photosphere) is the final stage in the mechanism that makes the sun shine. But this is not true. It has no explanation for the majority of the sun from this point onwards, it fails to explain why the photosphere is at a temperature minimum, it fails to explain why the corona is millions and millions of degrees hotter than the sun, it fails to explain why the solar wind stops completely on occasions (sometimes for days), it fails to explain why the equator rotates more rapidly than the rest of the sun, the filamentary structure of the corona, why particles accelerate with increasing distance to the sun, and a whole host of other issues that are better explained with the electric sun model.
The main Problems with the current model of the sun are as follows:
* Temperature of the halo-like corona is 300 times that of surface, violating the inverse square law for radiation * Rotates faster at equator, faster on surface * Solar wind accelerates (somehow) upon leaving the Sun * Sunspots reveal cooler interior * Sunspots travel faster than surrounding surface * Sunspot penumbra (interior walls) reveal structured filaments and move much faster than slow convection should allow
An eletcrical model would solve many of these problems.
To its advantage the electric sun model is relatively simple. It is entirely self consistent and does not require the existence of mysterious entities such as the unseen solar dynamo that lurks somewhere behind the fusion model and creates impossible 'tangled magnetic fields' that produce sunspots. (The very word dynamo was coined by electrical engineers to describe a direct current generator. Magnetic fields are produced by electric currents in coils, inductors and transformers, not by the movement of hot gasses.). The ES model does not require arbitrary adjustments, exceptions to the laws of physics, or after-the-fact speculations. It passes the Occam's razor test far better than the current model.
In the ES sun hypothesis, the power of the sun does not lie deep within it, the sun sits as the focus of not only the planets but also a large plasmasphere. Due to its size the sun has a large electric capacitance; this capacitance receives charge from cosmic (birkeland) currents that exist in our arm of the galaxy. The sun thus exhibits a relatively high voltage and produces a double layer on its surface. The HELIOSPHERIC CURRENT CIRCUIT of 100,000,000 Amps flows into the sun, based on MHD considerations first derived by Nobel laureate Hannes Alfven. The sun is powered by its galactic environment, and not from within itself. http://www.electric-cosmos.org/sun.htm
Check out these links for some direct proof of this model, and the science behind it;
Keywords; hannes alfven, eric lerner, anthony peratt, kristian birkeland, charles bruce, halton arp donald scoot wallace thornhill ralph juergens plasma cosmology plasma universe electric universe
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
haramein is a pseudoscientist. Do not trust his words... even the most cursory education in physics will show you the fallacy in some of the crap he spouts
i never liked the berning fule typ explenation. is just seems like it would exaust it self to soon. and if your "theary" cant explain all the phisical aspects of whats going on it probaly is not corect.
I love the fact that neutrino deficiency and neutrino variability are actually solved problems of the nuclear sun model. Thank you Sudbury neutrino detector!
sorry but fusion reaction can only produce a thermodynamic explosion of matter. Unfortunately none of the mechanical aka thermodynamic models can create highly organized structures we observe in super nova formations. Explosions are very chaotic events. search for
Nuclear Explosion In Space
on youtube and watch what happens. No supernova hour-glass like formations of any kind
What? They're not 'highly organized'. You're talking about an uneven release of energy in a ZERO gravity environment after the star blows off its remaining mass. You DO know that those pretty pictures of Super Novas are composits from different cameras, right? In reality, not even half of those things are even visable to the naked eye (telescope).
I'm only a laymen, and I can already see the problems in your arguments.
what images did u look at? They are pretty damn organized structures if u r talking about an explosion.
yeah im aware they are not visible to a naked eye. But electromagnetic spectrum can only be produced by some form of matter, and this matter is in fact organized into toroid, hexagonal, filamentary and cylindrical bipolar structures you can see on those images
I don't understand why you're trying to pick a fight against me and my saying that it's possible that BOTH are occuring. If you don't agree, that's fine. But I don't rule the possibility out. Neither of us know all there is to know about this subject. So let's just agree to disagree.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Wonder if he's just 'over exagerating' hahahahaha
Do not trust his words... even the most cursory education in physics will show you the fallacy in some of the crap he spouts
search on youtube
haramein on the sun
Nuclear Explosion In Space
on youtube and watch what happens. No supernova hour-glass like formations of any kind
What? They're not 'highly organized'. You're talking about an uneven release of energy in a ZERO gravity environment after the star blows off its remaining mass. You DO know that those pretty pictures of Super Novas are composits from different cameras, right? In reality, not even half of those things are even visable to the naked eye (telescope).
I'm only a laymen, and I can already see the problems in your arguments.
yeah im aware they are not visible to a naked eye. But electromagnetic spectrum can only be produced by some form of matter, and this matter is in fact organized into toroid, hexagonal, filamentary and cylindrical bipolar structures you can see on those images