Part 3 - 5: Panel Discussion Sri Lanka War - Press TV

PART (1, 2, 3, 4, 5): PANEL DISCUSSION ON SRI LANKA WAR BY PRESS TV

Witness How A Civilized Society Justify Terrorism

Participants:

Lord. Naseby - Chairman Parliamentary group on Sri Lanka
Mr. Douglas Wicrmaratne -Chairman Sinhala Association
Mr. Surendran-British Tamil Forum Separatists Representative
Mr. Robert Evans- Member of European Union Parliament (UK)
Mr. Jeremy - Presenter Press TV

ILL POLICIES ON GLOBAL CONFLICTS

If civilized societies such as EU, (UK), USA, Norway, Canada Australia, protect & feed and defend terrorists of another country, you cant blame innocent civilians being killed on the battle field.

Before you turn on to others to blame, criticize your own policies on conflicts first and do not repeat same mistakes from one conflict to another.

If Taliban had been eliminated by Russia, Afghanistan could have been peaceful today. If Sadam was removed for his dictatorship then you should be also able to see LTTE dictatorship in the same perspective. LTTE killed Sri Lankans who disobeyed, used civilians as human shields, used biggest child soldiers brigade in the world, suicide bombers... etc.

Civilized societies have not so far recognized Sri Lanka war is a separatists' terrorism. Most defend LTTE terrorists. Cilvil societies have an obligation to protect a civil society from a terrorist group before its too late. Do not defend terrorists. Do not support Terrorists. Beware of Donations, Your Hard Earned Money May Use to Kill Many Thousands Civilians in Sri Lanka.

SRI LANKA WAR MY PERSPECTIVE

I salute Lt. Gen. Fonseka, Commander of Sri Lanka Army for being honest and using correct words which became a controversial issue on the discussion (Part-2) .

I understand clearly what made him to say Sri Lanka belongs to Sinhalese(which now multi ethnic). Sinhalese were massacred by the most ruthless separatist terrorists LTTE for the last 26 years and General Fonseka was one of survivor of a more than 200 sucide attacks of LTTE against Sinahalese & Muslims.

General is absolutely right. He has a right to say Sri Lanka belongs to Sinhalese and LTTE must be totally annihilated from Sri Lanka. Follow Majoritys as other countries.

Sinhala Only Act (1956) has been justified by S.W.R.D.B. why Sinhala as majoritys (70%-Sinhala) language should be the state language of Sri Lanka. Besides Sinhalese, Malay, Burgher, majority Muslims and Tamils do speak Sinhala since they live among Sinhala majority.

EUROPEANS & TAMIL SEPARATISM:

Why Europeans accuse Sinhalese and claim Sri Lanka has an Ethnic problem?
Why Europeans support Elam cause?
Are Tamil's allegations of (language) discrimination true?
Is Sri Lanka war an Ethnic problem or a Separatists Terrorists problem?

European's Colonial Apartheid Discrimination

When Europeans invaded South Africa, they started discriminating majority Black Africans. Black Africans were treated as second class citizens. White Europeans ruled the country. They separated Whites from Blacks. For example; they reserved front seats of the bus for whites and rear seats for blacks, Swimming pools used by Whites, blacks were not allowed Etc. Europeans discriminated black Africans. During Black Africans freedom struggle; Anti-Apartheid law Europeans had to give equal rights to Black Africans. Europeans discrimination declined after Anti-Apartheid law.

Tamil Separatists' Hypocrisy

When Sri Lanka was under English invaders (1796-1948), Tamils didnt mind (Separatist representative, Mr Surendrens claim in the Sri Lanka War Discussion, Press TV-Part-1,2,3) having English as the state language (English less than 1% of total population in Sri Lanka).

Surprisingly, after independence in 1948, when Sinhala became (1956) the state language (Majority Sinhalese 70% of total population) they claimed Sinhalese people discriminated Tamil people.

The question arise here is why Tamils didnt (dont) claim they felt discriminated when another minority English people made English language as the state language of Sri Lanka for over a century?

EUROPEANS PERSPECTIVE ON SRI LANKA WAR

Either Europeans see Sri Lanka War through ANTI-APARTHEID perspective and support Tamils to solve so called discrimination by Sinhalese, therefore a separate sate (Two states option) or Europeans see Sri Lanka war through APARTHEID perspective and encourage Tamils to be separated from Sinhalese like they did in South Africa separating Blacks from Whites.

Europeans cant claim Sri Lanka war as an Ethnic a problem and support Eelam since Tamils cant claim Sinhalese discriminated Tamils since Sinhala is majoritys language(90% of population speak Sinhalese including Tamils, Muslims since they live among Sinhalese). Infact Sinhalese fair enough, EU wants to justify separate terrorism through apartheid perspective! Defeat terrorism.
Absolutely, NO Eelam in Sri Lanka!

----------

NoEalamInSL 2009(C)

----

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• sri
• lanka
• sri lanka war
• sri lanka news
• Jeremy Corbyn
• Douglas Wickramaratne
• Lord Naseby
• robert evans
• surendren
• genocide in sri lanka
• EU
• Tamil Eelam
• Largest Hostage Rescue
• Nirj Deva
• Francis Boyle
• Eric Solheim
• USA
• UN
• HRW
• ICRC
• FBI
• CIA
• Law Maker
• Law Breaker
• Double Standards
• Political Hypocrites
• European Parliament
• LTTE Atrocities
• LTTE Cannibals
• westminister bridge
• tamil protest
• british tamil forum
• tamil diaspora

[NoEalamInSL]

How come it a mistake, when making Sinhala language as state language of Sri Lanka in 1956 when majotrity 78% sinhalase and no objection for English which was spoken by less than5%? dont play wrong politics lead to ethnic tension.

Dallas said: "The late S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike may be the founder of my party, but he had done a great injustice to the Tamils by making Sinhala the state language, and 51 years later President Mahinda Rajapaksa has rectified that mistake"

[NoEalamInSL]

It was their "International Court of Justice," at The Hague that declared apartheid does not violate human rights and the dignity of the non-white man.

- L. Jayasooriya 14-05-2009

[NoEalamInSL]

Sri Lanka is not having a dirty "Apartheid" law made by Europeans in S.Africa, whites in the front of the bus & blacks in the back of the bus. Shame on EU.

Dont look at SL in Europeans perspective. SL never had A Aaparheid law against Tamils. Do Not Generalize your EU mentality to all conflicts

EU wants to justify LTTE terrorism/ separatist terrorism through apartheid

[terroristclan1990]

oh my days if it was me i would hav just jumped across the table and fuked tht suresh guy for runnin his mouth like a lil bitch...btw good work man this vid is sick appreciate u puttin forwad the tru facts..peace fam

[NoEalamInSL]

Sinhala Only Act in 1956 (Sri Lanka) and the Tamil Hypocrisy

When English Only Act made English language as the state language imposed by 1% English people, Tamils didnt claim they were discriminated by having English as THE state language in Sri Lanka.

When Sinhala Only Act made Sinhala language as the state language imposed by 70% Sinhalese people, Tamil people did claim they were discriminated by having Sinhala as THE state language in Sri Lanka.

Defeat Terrorism in Sri Lanka!

[V95UNDERTAKER]

DUMB FUK SINHALA NOT EDUCATED...TAMIL EELAM WILL BE FREE!!

[michaelw2711]

2nd from left seems very dogmatic.

[Tamilonthestreet]

Tamil people are not lovers of Bandaranayake Family!

They were well known Recists !

Mut Mahinda and his Family are great !

[xXxplayersevenxXx]

tak tak tak tak tak ....lies...

where is the free country?

[NoEalamInSL]

Kandy1boy,

HRC, HRW, EU, USA,

all double talks, double standards, prejudiced, biased. we cant trust them. guardians of democracy have let down the small nations. different treatments, big nations misuse power. The europeans alley destroy, terrorize the world. they have different yard sticks for same human rights vioaltions. they think rest of the world is stupid. SL isnt afraid of any war tribunals. but it should be applied to all. in that case USA, UK standing front of the waiting list.