Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

CNN ad responds to Fox ad's false claim: "Fox News: distorting, not reporting"

CNN ad responds to Fox ad's false claim: "Fox News: distorting, not reporting" - 9/18/2009  
 
Customize

More From: PoliticsCentralX

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
986 ratings
Sign in to rate
79,474 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (950)   Options

Loading...
MrBrian987987 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
CNN = communist national news
steel1968 (1 week ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Yeah, I'd keep it simple too if I was you. Afterall, when you don't really have facts to back up such opinionated words, you need to keep it short and sweet and hope no one like me calls you out for not knowing what you're taking about.
CamiloSanchez1979 (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
FOX NEWS = fear-mongering
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
steel1968 (2 weeks ago)
Comment removed by author
steel1968 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
I'm taking into account the ENTIRE body of text, especially what followed that ONE SENTENCE you are obsessed with.

That's not contradiction thats just being rational. You're the one taking it out of context by IGNORING the rest of the comment.

If you study the whole thing, you realize she is discussing with them, overocming life's goals ahead of them and picking their own battles, fighting their own fight, etc. Its just common sense.
HarrisonOdell (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Wow, by using Mao Tse Tung? I never ignored anything. The point she's making is to "overcome challenges"; something to that effect. She uses Mao's "achievements" as an example to her speech. If one of her favorite political philosophers (PP) is indeed Mao Tse Tung, which she said, then it would come as no surprise to us if she used any teaching he upheld.

Common sense? I again ask you: Why use mass murderer Mao as an example? The only plausible explanation is because he's truly her fav. PP.
steel1968 (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Yes, you're right, she just really likes mass murderes. She thinks they're cool.
And it's complete coincidence that this "just happened" to come out 3 days after she slammed Fox.

Someone once told me, "You cannot rationalize with irrational people."

It's called a juxtapose. You take the 2 opposite ends of the spectrum to make a common statement. If anything, it shows that she views Mao as the extreme evil, pinning him up against Mother Teresa.
HarrisonOdell (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Post hoc ergo propter hoc. I drank water from the pond and got a fever, therefore, the pond water caused it.

One of the Protestant movement's most important doctrines is Sola Scriptura, but the Protestant demoninations have since broken. Therefore, Sola Scriptura caused the denominational split.

You're giving just another example: Anita Dunn was "exposed" on Fox after she reamed Fox News. Therefore, Fox News aired such material because of her remarks... Right. Look at the facts, dear.
steel1968 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Dear?

Ok, we're going there, we must be getting desperate.

Sweet pea I gave you the facts.
If you arent intelligent enough to put the pieces together that it wasnt just a tad coincidental thqt after having been in office for nearly 6 mos. suddenly 3 days after she FINALLY put Fox in check, they air a speech they already had, and did the biggest spin on it they could and ppl like you bought right into it.

But hey, CNN wasnt there right, thats what Fox says.
They report, you decide.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.