9/11 In Plane Sight - Directors Cut

DVD available at http://www.911inplanesite.com/

If A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words, What Is A Video Worth?

What "In Plane Site" accomplishes that no other video expose' on September 11th has to date, is it exposes the viewer to a barrage of news clips from a majority of the mainstream news outlets. The official story of that day was told on live TV by reporters, policemen, firefighters, and other on-the-scene eyewitnesses, however, that footage was shown only once on live television broadcasts in the first hours of the attacks and then... it was never repeated. The stories changed, information was enigmatically omitted, and what can only be described as officially prescribed propaganda took the place of indisputable reality.

THE PENTAGON: Some of the most damning evidence surrounding the attack on the Pentagon centers about substantial and incontrovertible video and photographic evidence which insights viewers to ask crucial and essential questions. After all, the laws of physics cannot be suspended or can they?

One question many viewers ask is, "why was America and the rest of the world not shown the video footage and the photographs of the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed?" Many people do not realize that the outer wall of the Pentagon did not collapse until 20 minutes after the initial impact of what we were told was a Boeing 757.

Upon examining these photographs, one can clearly see a hole, which is only 16 feet in diameter. This begs the question: "How can a Boeing 757 which is over 44 feet in height and 124 feet in width simply disappear without a trace into a hole that is only 16 ft. in diameter? Also, why is there no external damage to the Pentagon where the wings and the tail section would have impacted with the outer wall?
Contrary to the video footage shown to the American public, photographs taken only moments after the impact show no wreckage on the lawn of the Pentagon. Where is the plane? Where are the wings, the tail, the luggage, the seats, the landing gear, and the engines? Most importantly, what happened to the passengers who were aboard that plane?

America remembers the photographs that they were shown of tiny, indiscernible fragments, which were described as pieces of a Boeing 757. Were these fragments of a Boeing 757? Internal photographs of the Pentagon taken by Jocelyn Augustino, a FEMA photographer, do not show engine parts matching the description of a 757's engine turbofan according to John W. Brown, a spokesperson for Rolls Royce. Both Pratt & Whitney and Rolls Royce manufacture the engines used on these jetliners. The turbofans themselves are approximately 7 feet in diameter. The FEMA photos show what appears to be a single turbofan that is approximately 3 feet in diameter. This better fits the descriptions of eyewitnesses who claim that they saw what could only be described as a commuter plane capable of holding only 8 to 12 passengers. This single piece of evidence also helps support other reports from witnesses such as Lon Rains, editor for "Space News," who was quoted as saying "I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound.

I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast -- it sounded nothing like an airplane." Don Parkal said, "A bomb had gone off. I could smell the cordite. I knew explosives had been set off somewhere." Tom Seibert said, "We heard what sounded like a missile."

• Category

  News & Politics

[vengencefrom1979]

when ever any 'terrorist' actually goes to a 'real' trial this case would be blown wide open, as the 'right wing' has nothing to substantiate their claims.

[TheTwist555]

ASK ASTRALS, SPIRITS, TANTRIKS, OUIJA SPIRIT BOARD Remote Vision for 911 Culprits

Dont Break your heads analyzing hours and hours

U can get the results in 30 minutes

[MrRandomGuy86]

Right, and ignore all of the eyewitnesses, radar, black boxes recovered, passenger dna identification, and the rest of the body of evidence that a plane hit the pentagon. "If I can't see it on video then it didn't happen." That's a good philosophy for a sheeple like you. So I guess you believe the Bin Laden confession since it was on video right? Oh no you probably don't believe it because it would disagree with your sheeple viewpoint. That's right.

[MrRandomGuy86]

Nanothermite was not found widdle sheeple. Did you even read the "study?" No you didn't because you're a gullible ignorant dipshit sheep who blindly believes everything the conspiracy shepherds spoon feed you. They used magnets to get chips out then compared them to NON MAGNETIC paint. ZERO effort to see if it was anything else. Soaked chips in MEK with the ONLY reaction being faded color, meaning not enough aluminum was present to indicate thermite.

Wake the fuck up dumb dipshit sheeple.

[mag0g01]

Vonkleist you skinny dying weasel! If United 93 landed at Cleveland, why did my family not come home!! As of the rest of your brainwashed theories, you seriously need to go home and stick your head in the oven!

[Paul Bondurant]

Actually there was nano thermite found in the dust from the wtc . So you are correct no explosives because nano thermite is an incendiary !! I believe you should watch the videos made by the Architects and engineers for 9/11 truth

[kawazaki7501]

As I thought, yanks believing anything they are told by their government. No plane, no wreckage, no footage from cctv. Footage would reinforce the story for you yanks as it did in NYC, but guess what, no cctv footage at the Pentagon. There was no plane, no fuel spill, NYC burned for days, but the Pentagon has an immaculate lawn still, and one fire engine. Wake up!

[Zio--Cancer]

9/11: A Conspiracy Theory /watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98 Fake Al CIa DUh Actors EXPOSED! Adam Gadahn & Yousef al-Khattab /watch?v=GsUtvOW6SR0 Why The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11 /watch?v=kVKGRB3cygg War by Deception 2013 /watch?v=pK6VLFdWJ4I 9/11 Missing Links /watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4 9/11 False Flag Conspiracy - Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives) /watch?v=n_fp5kaVYhk