Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Mercury Filling Removal Dangers

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
22,412
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 24, 2010

Beyond the debate among dentists on the efficacy of dental amalgam for tooth restoration lies the undisputed safety concerns over its removal. Learn how and why dental amalgam, more commonly known as mercury fillings, should be removed in order to ensure the safety of a patient, dentist and dental staff. Read more at: http://www.angieslist.com

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I personally don't care for amalgam fillings. I know they last a long time but when they break,

    they break big. The prep for these usually removes alot of tooth structure and that is no good.

    And doesn't the ADA hold the patent to amalgam fillings? So of course they don't want to be at fault at all for the risks involved with mercury. Its toxic we all know it. When you mix this material it hardens and then over a period of years, it wears and cracks and breaks...It's like a wedge in your tooth

  • @sheree1969 just qa little sarcasm someone said don't remove the filllings because it won' tdo any good.

  • @amerikaiscommunist What????

  • @MsHojat If you have aid in your ass maybe, but if you don't have aid another cock might give you aids.

  • @video0bserver So just get all teeth filled with mercury? maybe suck on mercury lolly pop?

  • mercury stays in your skull for 40 years so removing mercury fillings don't do shit your basically your fucked.

  • Removing mercury fillings does not remove the mercury poisoning. If you have mercury poisoning from mercury filling (or any other source), removing the source of the problem will not fix the problem. Mercury remains in your system indefinitely unless it is specifically removed via a treatment such as chelation.

  • The ADA was wrong 150 years ago when it said Amalgam Fillings didn't release mercury, and it's just as wrong today when it says that mercury released from amalgams isn't enough to cause health hazards to anyone, except for a very small number of people who are allergic to mercury. What is even more amazing is that some pro-amalgam dentists, in spite of the ADA's admission to the contrary, continue to believe and tell patients that amalgams don't release mercury.

  • @DarthVulva he's right, it is dodgy....

  • @DarthVulva hmm, guess youre right...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more